Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
The embarrassing drunkard uncle of invention.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:
pass:
register,


                           

Alternate Re-use Rocket Fuel Tank

Use a spent rocket fuel tank for something else other than holding fuel.
  (+3, -2)
(+3, -2)
  [vote for,
against]

This idea is for a rocket fuel tank that is not reusable as a fuel tank. But why send it back to earth ?

As an example, make a habitation module for a future mission to mars or space station and fill it with H or O. Once in space, just vent the module for a while and move in.

This way, you could well end up with just an efficient rocket since it doesn't need the 'just a fuel tank' section.

Alternatively keep the main rocket fuel tank and use it as a radiation shield.

Payload as rocket structure.

bigsleep, Sep 16 2009

Wet Launch Habitation Modules http://home.earthli...~jedcline/wlhm.html
Grr, but not widely known. [bigsleep, Sep 16 2009]

A visual of one such proposal. http://www.immigrat...ism-ring%5B1%5D.jpg
[2 fries shy of a happy meal, Sep 16 2009]

DEVO London 2009 http://www.youtube....watch?v=3CUAx8kjYtI
Space Junk is about halfway in - 2:50ish. [Ian Tindale, Sep 17 2009]

http://www.newscien...to-tidy-up-spa.html http://www.newscien...to-tidy-up-spa.html
http://www.newscien...to-tidy-up-spa.html
[Ian Tindale, Sep 21 2009]

[link]






       In the "Red Mars" series by Kim S. Robinson, the astronauts do exactly this.
sninctown, Sep 16 2009
  

       It amazes me that the ISS wasn't built from dumb rockets like this, collected and put together in space by the shuttle. Hell, soyuz stuff can even auto-dock.
bigsleep, Sep 16 2009
  

       You mean like Skylab (1973-79)?
coprocephalous, Sep 17 2009
  

       This'd be a good motive for a private venture - use existing space junk.
Ian Tindale, Sep 17 2009
  

       Makes perfect sense. [+]
theleopard, Sep 17 2009
  

       This is a widely known idea in the field. The reason it isn't implemented is that the tanks never get that close to orbit. A quick Google search tells me it gets ejected <120km altitude, so WAY short of the ~300km orbital altitude and that doesn't even count the delta V which would require even more than the MASSIVE energy needed to get it to 300km. Oh, and that tank is not light either. So sorry (-).
MisterQED, Sep 17 2009
  

       Swing by and tack a booster on it, to get it to LEO. Then it's useful.
UnaBubba, Sep 17 2009
  

       I imagine that fuel tanks are more pressure-resistant than necessary for a habitation module... concentric-layer fuel tanks ?
FlyingToaster, Sep 17 2009
  

       Perhaps they could be used on earth... they appear to all be headed right back here anyway, and I'd imagine a parachute fit for the task of getting them back safely would add less to the payload than a booster for getting them the rest of the way into orbit.
ye_river_xiv, Sep 22 2009
  
      
[annotate]
  


 

back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle