 h a l f b a k e r y Birth of a Notion.
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
Login
Create account.
|
|
| Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
| |
Good idea but there's no infrastructure to support this -- other than call forwarding, I suppose. However, "offices of the future" will probably just call your mobile in the first place. |
|
| |
It would take some time to work out the bugs on a concept like that. It seems to me that someone would start "call snatching" like if you were in sales and a fellow rep heard your phone ringing he could discreetly take the call from you without ever knowing what happened. |
|
| |
[jscotty] I'm pretty sure such goings-on happen fairly frequently with today's PBX systems. The idea doesn't really introduce a new liability, just extends it to make it easier. |
|
| |
Presumably, the system could wait until a recognized cell- or land- phone attached, or timeout after 10 seconds or so, and allow the interloper to connect. Most of the behavior could be dictated by the user/subscriber. |
|
| |
and this could be done without changes in infrastructure (but with changes in phones of course)... basically using some kind of voice streaming between the phones using short-range radio (i'm thinking bluetooth.) |
|
| |
kinda like a mobile that doubles up as a bluetooth cordless handset. |
|
| |