Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
fnord

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:
pass:
register,


                                                   

Domestic Greywater Sediment Filter

extract the phosphates, sulphates, nitrates and other chemicals before they reach the sewer
  (+3, -2)
(+3, -2)
  [vote for,
against]

As many of you probably know, waterways are being polluted by phosphates, nitrates and sulphates caused by the human element of the environment.

This is probably not a huge problem where the sewers are well maintained, but in areas where the sewers are not well maintained this causes algae blooms and poisoning of wildlife. I must also mention that run off from agriculture is a major pollutant - which this idea does not address.

The idea is to direct domestic greywater systems (kitchen/bathroom sink, shower/bath, dishwasher/clotheswasher etc) into a sediment tank before releasing the waste water into the sewer.

This is specifically how this invention would work:

1. drain water is aerated by a technique similar to homogenization (used in milk) under strong ultraviolet light (causing ozone to form). The effect would hopefully be the further oxidization of any reactions that can be oxidized further. This would also kill any microbes.

2. Mix iron (recycled from the scrap yard) powder (also possibly carbon and aluminum - cheap and plentiful) to cause precipitation of any compounds that can be precipitated. Application of electrolysis would also be interesting to experiment with in the development phase.

3. Collect sediments in government issued sludge containers. The sludge would then be recycled to extract phosphates, sulphates and nitrates for use in industry. The overall effect of this would be fewer bioavailability nutrients entering the waterways and thus have effect on conserving our environment.

codrakon, Aug 31 2009

1.greywater 1 http://www.greywater.co.za/
a company that has explored a similar idea [codrakon, Aug 31 2009]

2.greywater 2 http://www.greywater.com/
another similar idea [codrakon, Aug 31 2009]

3 http://www.sei.se/n...phosphate-rock.html
global phosphate shortages [codrakon, Aug 31 2009]

4 http://www.theaustr...60117-30417,00.html
more global phosphate shortages [codrakon, Aug 31 2009]

Brac System http://www.bracsystems.com/products.php
Something like this? [energy guy, Aug 31 2009]

sphere fountain http://www.allisonarmour.us/aqualens/
an alternative way of aerating and oxidising reactions in water. just put a really bright uv light in the middle of this sphere. mirrors beyond the water sphere to reflect light back and make more ozone, [codrakon, Sep 01 2009]

Phosphate Pollution http://www.youtube....watch?v=g0tvk7Xg8cs
From detergents [codrakon, Sep 01 2009]

phosphates in laundry detergent (or not) http://www.treehugg...hate-free_soaps.php
[FlyingToaster, Sep 01 2009]

Dwindling Freshwater http://www.azcentra...7vip-gober0817.html
trouble is headed our way [codrakon, Sep 02 2009]

[link]






       Hm... doesn't have the ring of a new idea.
21 Quest, Aug 31 2009
  

       once again, this device is not commercially available, additionally the idea that a government program that issues 'sludge' containers to collect and recycle domestic household waste is not established.   

       also how many recycling systems use waste carbon/iron/aluminium to recover even more recyclable materials?
codrakon, Aug 31 2009
  

       [-] the effort is going into the wrong place: in a city, rather than buy and install a million of these plants and keep them supplied, why not just build one treatment plant ? Bear in mind that graywater helps move blackwater to the treatment plant.   

       Still, if you can find a way to do it without having to supply every single household with flocculants I'll bun it.
FlyingToaster, Aug 31 2009
  

       I think that recycling in a big plant may be easier in some respects, due to the volume of precipitates and the economy of scale that can be achieved by recycling large amounts of waste.   

       I also think that upgrading sewerage treatment plants to recycle the waste might also be quite expensive. Also the waste received by sewerage treatment plants contains large amounts of organic material, which complicates the process compared with recycling the relatively high concentrates of phosphates, nitrates and sulphates in the domestic sludge containers - because it is concentrated it is easier to recycle, perhaps. The high concentration of (hopefully insoluble) metal salts (iron/ aluminum/ potassium/ sodium) might also make for commercially viable extraction.   

       To reduce the amount of organic waste (entering the processing system) such as hair, food particles and the odd tooth and wedding ring, the homogenizer that sprays the waste water onto a ceramic plate could also be a means to separate larger solids (which will generally be organic in greywater).   

       If one applies electrical charge and rotational force and perhaps even ultrasound to the greywater it might cause the colloids to form large enough particles to precipitate, thus negating the need for chemical flocculants. according to Wikipedia, aluminum and iron are already used widely as flocculants. to address the need for the 'flocculant powder' I suggest that household would be issued with the certain ration of flocculants each time their sludge container is emptied by the recycling company.   

       On this note, not all houses have gardens that they can redirect greywater into, and having done this myself it is not always a good idea. too many nutrients can and will kill plants and animal life in the soil. secondly I think complexes and townhouses might join plumbing together to have a neighborhood size extraction units. this could even scale to suburb size units if necessary, provided that the concentrate sludge remains viable to recycle. in this case, each household does not need to have a supply of flocculants.   

       The (cleansed) water that is released into the sewer from the domestic sediment plant would still help the blackwater reach the sewerage processing plant.
codrakon, Aug 31 2009
  

       Since I'm all for neighbourhood-sized treatment plants I'm not sure why I keep wanting to cover your idea with piscine skeletons, but there we are.   

       Note that if you have heavy metals in your bathwater, there's something wrong with you (err no offense 8/7)
FlyingToaster, Aug 31 2009
  

       As far I can make out [FlyingToaster] heavy metals in bath water would be in very low concentrations and has nothing to do with this idea.   

       Perhaps I should have defined greywater [^]1,2. Since I addressed all of the issues you raised I would have preferred a bun. Anyway there you go.
codrakon, Aug 31 2009
  

       huh, I was sure I read "heavy metals reclamation" in there somewhere.   

       Regardless, the only thing you have to worry about, if you're worried about it at all, is soap residue: phosphates and nitrates I think.   

       ps: not my bone up there.
FlyingToaster, Aug 31 2009
  

       My apologies. The point is to extract the soap residues, before they reach the general sewage lines. In the hope of economically recycling the phosphates and other stuff.   

       The reason is to prevent the build up of phosphates and other greywater compounds in the waterways and prevent algal blooms and animal deaths.   

       Check [^]3,4 for information about commercial phosphate shortages.
codrakon, Aug 31 2009
  

       I think this has been baked in different ways before. The most common is a septic tank (Granted it doesn't feed into the city wastewater system, but its the same principal. Living machines pretty much do the same thing.   

       Lastly, a Canadian company called Brac makes a similar system.
energy guy, Aug 31 2009
  

       This system is more that the links mentioned here. It is perhaps about a communal way of saving water, and preventing pollution, in a way that will counter depleting phosphate resources.   

       The domestic sludge might provide a rich concentrate raw material for further recycling.
codrakon, Aug 31 2009
  

       it just seems very labour intensive to remove chemicals which can leach into the soil naturally without problems (in household amounts) and indeed are fertilizer. Regarding "phosphate shortage", phosphates are banned in laundry detergents in quite a few countries <link>. Now if we're talking heavy urban areas with 40-storey apartment buildings and no green... well that's a different level of concentration.   

       On the other hand, an apartment complex could probably not only support it's own wastewaters (/garbage/recycling) treatment facilities, but actually save money doing so, by working a deal with local government.
FlyingToaster, Sep 01 2009
  

       You certainly can't direct partially or untreated water back into the ground. It fills up aquifers with toxic crap in short order.   

       I'm pretty certain that reticulated sewerage is a superior idea to the one postulated here. What isn't yet widely done, is to adequately address the recycling of precipitates and solids for agricultural uses.
UnaBubba, Sep 01 2009
  

       [UB] assuming by reticulated sewage you mean, the conventional system - if not, please link.   

       i think that since most of the crap that goes down the drain in terms of detergents is recoverable to some extent. additionally, with greywater especially, it is possible to reuse the water (-minus detergents) for applications that do not require drinking water. with some further purification it can probably be safe to drink.   

       so the idea proposes a way to economically recycle the concentrated chemicals we put into reticulated sewage - reducing pollution and decreasing our dependency on limited resources. if it is indeed worth it then additional benefits such as a partly reusable freshwater supply and an overall lower environmental impact per household (nationwide) would probably result in a better life for us all.
codrakon, Sep 02 2009
  

       I meant reticulated sewerage. Sewerage is a network of sewers.   

       Sewage, on the other hand, is the waste liquid and material that sewerage carries away to be dumped or treated.   

       This is a distinction lost on many English speakers, it seems.   

       If you care to do your research, you'll find that many city municipalities around the world treat and recycle sewage for drinking water. It's remarkably commonplace and safe.
UnaBubba, Sep 02 2009
  

       yes i am aware that sewage treatment plants produce potable water.   

       i am suggesting that between our domestic outlets for greywater and the main sewer, that it could be feasible to syphon off the greywater and treat it separately to the water in the sewer.   

       if such treatment of grey water took place in household, neighbourhood (such as an apartment complex) and suburb level, perhaps it could sustain a recycling plant, that would recover the relatively high concentrations of chemicals that could be cycled back into industry (or agriculture).   

       as a bi-product, a local freshwater supply would be in the vicinity of the greywater treatment plant.   

       i think that early versions should be designed into newly erected buildings, like [FlyingToaster] suggests.
codrakon, Sep 02 2009
  

       idea category ?
FlyingToaster, Sep 07 2009
  
      
[annotate]
  


 

back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle