Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
Experiencing technical difficulties since 1999

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:
pass:
register,


                         

Download / Upgrade Inside Outlook

Or whatever mail client you use.
  (+1, -3)
(+1, -3)
  [vote for,
against]

Downloading software, music, movies and practically anything else is dangerous. It's difficult to tell whether there is a bug in it so you try to find safe sites and forego otherwise attractive downloads.

Email, on the other hand, is assumed to be full of viruses, trojans, keystroke loggers and all manner of other nasties. These are almost certain to be blocked by a good anti-virus app.

Therefore, it makes sense to utilise one of the most abused and overutilised protocols around; SMTP. When you download something, you do it from inside your email client, subjecting it to scrutiny by your mail security software on the way in.

UnaBubba, Sep 17 2009

[link]






       I read Outlook as Cookbook for some reason... would've been better.
21 Quest, Sep 17 2009
  

       Perhaps for cockroaches?
UnaBubba, Sep 17 2009
  

       that is if you have the patience of the mighty oak, or a 14.4 kbps modem. SMTP is a slow protocol not only due to being designed for small packets but because every server treats STMP like steerage and gives it really low priority. And don't fool yourself, your e-mail program is no better at detecting compressed or otherwise hidden malware than a sieve is at separating gasoline from water.
WcW, Sep 17 2009
  

       Most secure SMTP filters block all exes. They know that no matter what, they'll never be able to find all the obfuscated viruses, and spyware hidden in the .exe
If you tell your SMTP filter to allow this, it will just scan it with the same kind of antivirus that you may have on your desktop
Why not scan it with your own desktop antivirus in the first place? Because it doesn't catch all the bad stuff? Neither will the SMTP antivirus.
ixnaum, Sep 17 2009
  

       Most servers also block large texts and transfers over a set size 2mb-10mb generally and are thus worthless for sending large files. The way in which files are transferred is so inefficient that old servers would let you use FTP to actually download large attachments rather then trying to send them via STMP with it's long negotiation protocols and proclivity to time out.
WcW, Sep 17 2009
  

       Just so ya know, I didn't vote one way or another on this idea.
21 Quest, Sep 17 2009
  

       Remember to use your neutral vote! [=]
CaptainClapper, Sep 17 2009
  

       A title in search of an idea? [-]
pocmloc, Sep 17 2009
  

       Nah, I think in puns all of the time. I live on the second nature strip.   

       The idea came to me when Bullguard, my virus scanner, snagged something like 15 bugs yesterday.
UnaBubba, Sep 17 2009
  

       As an email administrator I'd like to slap you in the teeth.
Noexit, Sep 17 2009
  

       I'm sure you would. Perhaps you'd be better employed developing a better standard of MIME? It's been largely unchanged since about 1982.   

       Remember too, that FTP was used for messaging back in the ARPANET days, in the late 60s and early 70s. People have subverted email to do all sorts of things for which it was never intended, hence the problems of maintaining a working system in the face of growing abuse, with html, rtf and images cluttering up POP and SMTP servers.
UnaBubba, Sep 17 2009
  

       ... happy all the time!<obscure Christian children's music reference>
RayfordSteele, Sep 17 2009
  
      
[annotate]
  


 

back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle