 h a l f b a k e r y Trying to contain nuts.
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
or Create a new account.
|
|
| Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
A typical standard prime lens will be
perhaps six elements in five groups. A
classic Tessar design will be four elements
in three groups. A triplet is three elements
in three groups. Even a triplet can produce
some excellent results, as I've found out
recently with my older-than-myself
Rolleicord
II.
This idea is for a lens that comes in
popular contemporary dSLR mounts, and
offers what is essentially only a triplet
prime of perhaps standard focal length
only (eg, about 33mm?). The difference is
that this simple lens has no glass - each
element of the triplet is made of an
optically transmissive gel sealed within a
more substantial pair of convex discs to
form the meniscus lens, and can be
deformed. The entire triplet unit gets
deformed as a unit, by design of the
barrel. The barrel will have been designed
to house the focus helicoid, but in this
case, is made all floppy too, so that
squeezing the barrel in such a way as to
laterally distort it, carries much of that
tortion to the gel elements in the triplet
unit, distorting that, too (but not too
much, and not severely).
The result might be that the lens when
distorted laterally will act as a feeble but
crude shift lens, with no accuracy
whatsoever, and in being distorted will
also introduce normally intolerable
amounts of primary and secondary
chromatic abberation and spherical
abberation, as well as nonlinear
displacement of the image.
If you let the distortion of the triplet unit
be too great, you'll just end up pushing
the image circle off the area of the sensor
- it's got to be a fairly subtle action, and
so the result will be quite subtle too. It
won't be the camera equivalent of a hall of
mirrors effect. It'll simply be the equivalent
of the worst lens design errors you can
have imagined, but dynamically
manipulable or mutable.
(ps: can we do a Camera: Lens category?
Ta.) Lensbaby
http://www.lensbabies.com/ Low-fi 35mm tilt/shift lens accessory [mab, Oct 31 2006]
Liquid Lense
http://www.primidi.com/2004/12/02.html [jhomrighaus, Oct 31 2006]
Company making Liquid Lense
http://www.varioptic.com/en/ [jhomrighaus, Oct 31 2006]
Another liquid Lense
http://www.imre.a-s...uidlens/default.asp [jhomrighaus, Oct 31 2006]
Short name, e.g., Bob's Coffee
Destination URL.
E.g., http://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
Sounds a lot like a "Lensbaby" (see link), which has been commercially available for a couple of years. These aren't made of gel, but they do achieve your goal of giving your (d)slr the flexibility of a Sinar with all the optical quality of a Holga. |
|
| |
No, those don't have deformable elements. |
|
| |
This won't work for a dslr, but you can get some (unpredictable) deformation effect on a 35mm film camera by wadding some tissue between the film and the pressure plate. The gel lens would, of course, be more flexible, but I'm just thinking of ways of getting these effects with commercial off the shelf gear. |
|
| |
Not sure exactly what the idea is here but if the description is the idea then see links for non glass based optics for use in cameras. |
|
| |
The liquid lens (you've spelled 'lens'
incorrectly by appending a superfluous
vowel) uses electrowetting and an oil/
water junction, but unfortunately won't
work at the size of a dSLR due to gravity
deformation. As far as I know, currently,
anyway. |
|
| |