Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'

h a l f b a k e r y
Open other side.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: Browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

User:
Pass:
Login
Create account.


                    Please log in.
If you're not logged in, you can see what this page looks like, but you will not be able to add anything.

Get Loads MORE Power.
Get lots of power, plus metals. (Belated post. Should have posted saturday.)
  (+7, -10)
(+7, -10)
  [vote for,
against]


Ok, first we find a bunch of small asteroids, or small comets. Redirect them so they will slam into a specific area of the earth. Maybe we use cold fusion, or zero point energy to do this

At the spot where they are going to hit the earth we create an hourglass shaped lake, with one end higher than the other. In the waist of the hourglass we place a reversable turbine hydroelectric generator.

When the asteroids crash/splash into the lower half of the lake, which has really high walls, the splash drives water through the turbines into the upper half of the lake, generating power. Then as the water drains back into the lower lake, it generates yet more power. While the water is draining dredge ships scoop out the bits of asteroid for metals processing. When all the water has drained back to the lower half, the next asteriod spashes down, starting the cycle over again.


Galbinus_Caeli, Apr 03 2006


Short name, e.g., Bob's Coffee

Destination URL. E.g., http://www.coffee.com/

Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)







       //Maybe we use cold fusion, or zero point energy to do this//   

       Um, if we had workable cold fusion or zero point energy, would we need to capture asteroids for their kinetic energy?   

       This is one of the most half-baked ideas I've seen here in a while. But since that's the name of the game here, [+]

Freefall, Apr 03 2006
  

       Really it would be better to direct the asteroids onto a giant waterwheel (except it would be turned by asteroids, not water). It would be really big, so only the power of incoming asteroids could turn it. This would capture the kinetic energy and slow the asteroids down. They would then descend into the aforementioned lake, gentle raising the water lever to capture additional power via another smaller waterwheel that really works with water.

bungston, Apr 03 2006
  

       Maybe if we aimed the asteroids at major population centres then we could significantly reduce our energy needs? (Says he, sitting smugly miles from the nearest Ikea).

boysparks, Apr 03 2006
  

       what's a smugly mile?

methinksnot, Apr 03 2006
  

       //what's a smugly mile?//   

       Take a standard country mile, replace all the tractors with thirtysomethings driving pristine 4 by 4s and raise the house prices fourfold. Mix in an attitude that your car's paintwork is more important than gritting the roads and there you have it. Heck, I'm bitter.

boysparks, Apr 03 2006
  

       Power and expense used to redirect comets versus power and revenue reaped from turbine? That's a hard sell.   

       This sounds a bit like bad science to me, but sometimes I get in trouble for MFDing things, so I'll shut up.

Texticle, Apr 03 2006
  

       nutty[+]

BunsenHoneydew, Apr 06 2006
  

       [+] I'm with Freefall, definitely a half baked idea. Although the water would probably boil off as steam.

Livingfishguy, Sep 07 2007
  


 
back: main index
 business 
 computer 
 culture 
 fashion 
 food 
 halfbakery 
 home 
 other 
 product 
 public 
 science 
 sport 
 vehicle