 h a l f b a k e r y May contain nuts.
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
Login
Create account.
|
|
| Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
| |
I thought "gerbiling" was what Richard Gere does. |
|
| |
If you are using tank treads, you don't need a round wheel, do you? Make them flat bottomed like any other tank. |
|
| |
If you are using round wheels, tilting them inward would do nothing to prevent gerbiling--you'd just roll upside down anyhow, then fall over to the side. |
|
| |
If you are talking about putting funny treads on a wheel to prevent running on part of the sidewall, it's probably not needed. |
|
| |
Can you do a picture? I'm imagining a front view like this: /.\ which wouldn't prevent gerbilling. |
|
| |
+ I was just pondering a "Tri-wheel" the other day. Very odd. /I\ I did not get very far in the thinking process, but I thought the center wheel would be larger. (I thought that might prevent the gerbilling). |
|
| |
Most designs, I notice in your links, rely on a low centre of gravity to increase the stability.
I think there might be another way: Use a large lighter than air object which is fixed to the top of the wheel. Unfortunately, this would bring other disadvantages... |
|
| |
The antidote to gerbils is gimbals. |
|
| |
//If you are using round wheels, tilting them inward would do nothing to prevent gerbiling// |
|
| |
I disagree. Viewed from the side, the wheels would appear elliptical and so resist gerbilling as claimed; the centre of gravity would rise more for a given forward tilt angle. I'd guess the effect would be small (+). |
|
| |
Hey, good point. I never thought of that. But it would be a small effect, I think. I'll see if I can work out the geometry. |
|
| |