Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
Just add oughta.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:
pass:
register,


                                                       

Kill The Common Cold

It's so simple, I can't believe it's never been done!
  (+8, -6)
(+8, -6)
  [vote for,
against]

A mask, delivering treated air, heated to about 45degC (Like on a very hot day), to the sufferer of the cold for a few hours. Do it under supervision to forestall any heat stress issues.

Rhinoviruses are not tolerant of heat. In fact, an hour at 56degC will completely inactivate them. Similarly, 4 hours at 45C, which is easily tolerable, will take care of almost all respiratory bugs. Add in a little benzalkonium chloride (an antiseptic common in many medicines) and the process is hastened. The usual infusions of oil of wintergreen, etc. will make it all feel very therapeutic.

It will be uncomfortable for a few hours, but that's a small price to pay.

UnaBubba, Sep 08 2008

steam inhalers used to be all the rage - I can't see that this idea would make a cold worse! http://www.purelyga...id=23519&wysiwyg=10
[po, Sep 08 2008]

[link]






       You're back! Did you have a wee cold?
xenzag, Sep 08 2008
  

       Huh huh he... "wee"... he he huh he...   

       Does the time-tested method of steam inhalation (face over a bowl of steaming water with a towel over your head) work in this principle?
theleopard, Sep 08 2008
  

       You can't catch a cold in your wee, [xenzag]. Sorry to have to tell you that.
UnaBubba, Sep 08 2008
  

       Probably does, [Leopard]. It's just a lot more likely to be used and effective if it involves a shitload of technology and a stern nurse making sure you keep breathing hot air, I guess.
UnaBubba, Sep 08 2008
  

       This is bad science. Well, it's not half bad, but close. It doesn't address the other major way the virus is spread: contact.
Amos Kito, Sep 08 2008
  

       I once proposed an idea to sequester every person on the planet for 6 weeks, in family groups. It was universally howled down, as I recall. The basis of the complaints was impracticality.   

       It would have rid the world of almost all communicable diseases and only cost six weeks productivity worldwide. As it is we lose that every decade, due to relatively benign communicable disease.
UnaBubba, Sep 08 2008
  

       Unfortunately, the human body likewise will not stand internal temperatures of 45degC (a 40degC temperature is potentially lethal). While humans can survive external temperatures in this range, the body activates cooling mechanisms to keep the internal temperature down. Since virii are present throughout the body, anything that will thoroughly kill the virus will kill the host as well.
MechE, Sep 08 2008
  

       MechE, the author says that the air at the mask is heated. This would not effectively heat the entire person, and I think that's not the intention.   

       I received "vaporizer treatment" during many childhood colds. The steamy room "loosened the phlegm" and "killed the germs" as a bonus. At least it "killed germs" external to the person, but those germs would have died anyway. This idea is similar, only more portable.
Amos Kito, Sep 08 2008
  

       My point is that simply heating the air in the lungs won't kill the virus, as it is present throughout the body. To effectively kill the virus, you would have to raise the entire body temperature, and that is not possible to do without killing the host.
MechE, Sep 08 2008
  

       I've always thought that a modification of a conventional inline-heater shower would assist in this department. Most of the rhinoviruses live around the nose, mouth, facial area and one of the primary ways we spread them other than by airborne transmission is by touching our faces then touching other things that other people may touch, etc.   

       On occasions that I get colds, I spend a nice leisurely session in the shower getting my face, nose, mouth area fully hosed down by the shower. The more of a 'flushing' action one can apply, the better. Also, yet another good shampooing of the hair - even if not necessary - seems to do a good turn on such occasions, don't know why.   

       It might be feasible to have a 'mixer head' that introduces medication, antibiotic or a mild antibacterial additive to the shower, upon pressure of a certain trigger on the grip. I mean, it'd be a special shower head that you buy just for colds and flu and H5N1, not keep it on there all the time, but as a feature, facility and perhaps product, it might help, not hinder.   

       Providing you can convince people to shower directly into their nose and mouth without drowning, for as long as they can hold their breath.
Ian Tindale, Sep 08 2008
  

       UBie! Welcome back!   

       I hate to greet you with bad news, but this won't work. As has been pointed out, the cold virus will be intracellular once you have cold, and you can't raise the relevant cells to 45°C without killing them. Only "naked" virus can be killed this way.   

       Experimental proof: when I used to get colds, I went and saunad on a few occassions. Air temperature in excess of 90°C, no benefit whatsoever.
MaxwellBuchanan, Sep 08 2008
  

       Isn't the whole response of developing a fever a strategy, the human body has lived to tell about, to make the body inhospitable to foreign pathogens without the home base advantage?
rcarty, Sep 08 2008
  

       That oversimplifies things just a tad, [MB], [ME]. Rates of infection drop off rapidly in summer and peak in winter months. There's a good reason for that.   

       [MB], I appreciate that you spent a few minutes in the sauna at 90°C without effect. That is not what the idea is about, any more than it is about increasing the body temperature to 45°C, [ME]. Unless that's the REAL reason for the high casualty rate of US soldiers in Iraq... human bodies just can't survive air temperatures of 45°C, huh?   

       It's a controlled version of the bowl of steam and vapours, administered for a much longer period than hormal, backed up with medication. Like I said, it's never been done properly. The vast bulk of the virus organism is NOT intracellular, it's in the respiratory passages and therefore susceptible to this treatment.   

       That sort of attenuation of the population would give the body a better than even chance of fighting back early.
UnaBubba, Sep 08 2008
  

       UB, you can certainly survive AIR temperatures of 45°C (or, indeed, considerably higher).   

       However, this is not at all the same as raising your body temperature to 45°C - you're body temperature will not usually change by more than a degree or so. Exertion (or other circumstances) in this heat may raise your temperature by a couple of degrees, which is enough to make you feel pretty crap.   

       A body temperature of 40-41 degrees is a severe fever. A body temperature of 45°C is generally fatal. This is probably why fever (if you accept that it's an evolved response to try to attenuate heat-labile viruses) seldom goes above 40°C.   

       The upper part of the respiratory tract is designed to bring air to around 37°C and humidify it. I'd be very, very surprised if inhaling hot air had any significant effect on the finer bronchioles and alveoli; if it did, it would do a great deal of damage.
MaxwellBuchanan, Sep 08 2008
  

       //It's a controlled version of the bowl of steam and vapours, administered for a much longer period than hormal, backed up with medication. Like I said, it's never been done properly// my mother - an asthmatic used it via my dad, a pharmacist/chemist for years but no stats available!
po, Sep 08 2008
  

       Yes, but UBie is aiming to raise your *body* temperature to 45°C. You certainly wouldn't have a cold after that. Or a pulse.
MaxwellBuchanan, Sep 08 2008
  

       Needs a kazoo feature/function button.
skinflaps, Sep 08 2008
  

       //Yes, but UBie is aiming to raise your *body* temperature to 45°C.//   

       No, I'm not! None so blind as those... mutter... mumble...
UnaBubba, Sep 08 2008
  

       OK - you're trying to raise the temperature of the respiratory epithelium to 45°C. It's still a non-starter, sadly.
MaxwellBuchanan, Sep 08 2008
  

       Why are colds and 'flu's less prevalent in summer, then?
UnaBubba, Sep 08 2008
  

       People are generally less confined in the summer thus making communicable diseases less communicable.
rcarty, Sep 08 2008
  

       Explaining the marked increase in colds and influenza in Brisbane every year, at the time of the annual exhibition. Everyone is out and about and it spreads like wildfire.   

       I'm largely basing this idea on my observations of what works best. Heat and warm air seem to alleviate symptoms and curtail the longevity of the condition.
UnaBubba, Sep 09 2008
  

       I think the delay is that the bugs have to run the entire gauntlet before new strains get to us from Asia.
rcarty, Sep 09 2008
  

       Is there an inverse relationship between UV radiation levels and the spread of these viruses?
Ling, Sep 09 2008
  

       There is a method of oxygen delivery that we use at my workplace (i.e. a hospital) where the oxygen is humidified to about 30 degrees for a face mask. Most people cannot stand it as it makes them feel flushed, sweaty and hot. I doubt people would tolerate a hotter mask for four hours! Bring on the Vicks instead.
penguin_tummy, Sep 09 2008
  

       Where are you, [p_t]? It's 30deg here today and it's still supposed to be winter. Temperature perception is all relative to ambient. If you're in 22deg airconditioning then 30 seems like a sauna.
UnaBubba, Sep 09 2008
  
      
[annotate]
  


 

back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle