h a l f b a k e r y
"Not baked goods, Professor; baked bads!" -- The Tick
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
or Create a new account.
|
|
|
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Colour is merely the brain's interpretation of a bunch of photons flying around us, so why not see the world in negative vision. Why?!!! I hear you say, well, you could look at your holiday snap negatives and have instant colour vision. Clubs would not have blinding strobe lights because the light would
appear black. Funky web designs would actually appear rather dull thus exposing the lack of imagination when using inverse colour imagery...and so on. I'm having my eyes done next week!
Annotation:
|
| |
How is this supposed to work? |
|
| |
(See also a certain Calvin &
Hobbes strip.) |
|
| |
Maybe you already see in negative vision compared with
the rest of us. You'd never know the difference. |
|
| |
There have been experiments done with things like prisms to turn your view upside down. Your eyes adjust eventually, and you see things normally...For some reason, though, a setup to see in negative colors one never really adjusts to. It seems to have something to do with the highlights/shadows being in wildly incorrect positions. I don't remember where I read it, it was either an old Omni or Discover magazine...It was done with a two camera/small monitor setup to give stereo vision. |
|
| |
The dynamic range of the sensors would be all wrong, at the very least. Under very low light conditions, our eyes adapt via a number of techniques to become more sensitive. With negative vision, you'd need to somehow become very sensitive to slight variations in a uniformly bright field, and I'm pretty sure we're just physiologically incapable of that. |
|
| |