h a l f b a k e r yGet half a life.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
TLRs don't generally use helicoid
focusing,
instead mounting the lens pair firmly on
a
panel which is racked in and out in one
linear action.
In this design, instead of the lenses being
mounted on a single plate, pairs of
elements are
mounted on a single plate, thus a
sandwich or
laminate of plate/element
sets is formed. The gap between each
plate and its neighbours is actuated
using
an appropriate technology and controlled
with the aid of feedback, via a lever/knob
under the users control.
So, unlike most zoom lenses people are
accustomed to currently, these zooms
would not use a rotary gearing (or
helicoid) to arrange the element
positioning, nor to focus. The distance
between elements and cells could be
controlled electronically, to arrive at
different focal length arrangements, and
also to affect the overall focal distance.
A typical TLR has a rotary knob on one
side (Rolleis seem to have alternated
which
side, on different models), which is the
most common TLR pattern, although
others exist: the Mamiya uses a pair of
knobs at the bottom front edge, the
Minolta Autocord uses a lever under the
taking lens, the Ricoh Diacord does use a
form of helical focusing with opposing
levers poking out each side.
For this Zoom TLR, it might be nice to
have a complex solid-feeling single
control that you rotate in the normal
manner for focus, but push forwards or
pull back for zoom. This is interpreted by
a cpu into appropriate spacings of the
element and cell sandwiched layers.
I'm not sure what mechanisms should be
chosen for the actuation, but they should
maintain perfect parallel motion between
cell plates.
In most other respects, this would remain
similar to a contemporary TLR: it would
use 120 film, it would feature TTL
metering and flash control, it would be
compact, ergonomic and robust.
My Mamiya
http://www.flickr.c...-72157594207872508/ [Ian Tindale, Jun 23 2007]
[link]
|
| |
I bet I know who posted that one... <checks>. |
|
| |
Hi Ian! I understand very little about real cameras, but this sounds like a good thing. If we could use it on phone cameras as well it might help offset that annoying miniaturization thing that's going on with them. |
|
| |
In a perfect example of inefficient communication, the whole intelligent-sounding and doubtless well-thought-out and informative body of text to the left was met with "duuurgh, cameraaaaargh, hurgh hurgh hurgh" when it reached my brain. |
|
| |
That is to say, what [wags] said: I can appreciate a good photo, but I'm essentially clueless on real cameras. |
|
| |
<hums>
My Mamiya! /
Here I go agai-hain /
My my /
how can I resist you...
</hums> |
|
| |
[Juta] - You should be in advertising - your talents are wasted here. |
|
| |
Hey, [Ian], I've got two of those. Both have lots of miles on them, and issues, of course. |
|
| |
I have a manual and tools, and when I get sufficiently bored I work on them. |
|
| |