h a l f b a k e r yThere's no money in it.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
| |
I'm pretty sure this is thoroughly baked. <edit> I misread this idea. I recind the nature of that remark and move into a comfy [+-] </e> |
|
| |
I like the compressor though. |
|
| |
Not sure that the compressor would really be very practical. If it were realistically more effective than a straight electricity powered compressor I think people would have tried to make use of it. I suspect that the machine to produce the hydrogen would require mainenance. I can't see this improving on the current offshore Windfarms. And in Norway they even have underwater turbines shaped like aerogenerators. |
|
| |
Very Baked. Can't even be bothered to type any more.
[M-F-D] |
|
| |
I can't imagine a compressor being more efficient, it's probably not been used as Hydrogen generation isn't currently a major industry. |
|
| |
Maintenance should be negligible as it's only a couple of electrodes attached to a cable with a container over the generated hydrogen, ROVs are more than capable of providing all the neccessary maintenance. |
|
| |
Countries such as the UK have a bureacratic problem with off-shore wind farms, in international waters there's no one to complain about them. Vast farms can be developed far offshore with cost efficiencies from scale. |
|
| |
Make the cables retractable, thus prevent destruction of the turbines by submersing them. |
|
| |