h a l f b a k e r yOK, we're here. Now what?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
| |
too many people would end up
with tiny screwdrivers in their
eyes. |
|
| |
What if the lenses were liquid-
filled flexible planes that were
computer controlled and could hit
pre-set shapes? |
|
| |
They'd be controlled by squinting. |
|
| |
I should have been more specific. The set screws would be turned with your thumb and finger, not a screw driver. |
|
| |
You many not need the thumbscrews. |
|
| |
Some modern eyetests have an interactive, automative element to them, I believe, based on an observation of the eye. So you could possibly do the same by mounting small cameras to look at your eyes and automate the focusing part, possibly by using a PDA, or pocket computer, to do the number crunching. |
|
| |