h a l f b a k e r yCall Ambulance,
Rebuild Kitchen.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Parallel Halfbakeries
The name has spoken for itself: Create an engine that automatically edits/selects different sets of ideas on the main page and different sets of interactions for each idea. Apply selection differently for each user. | |
The reason I came up with this is the display-time on the main page has decreased considerably. The solution can only be generally relative. I would like a unique/randomly personalized navigation history to be there representing my preferences/annotations/ criticism I was addressed. This would be bakeable
by coherently assigning interactions between users. I will make this post a starting point. Assume it would only appear on the main page for some randomly selected users and for others it would only be visible via <recent> and other secondary navigation controls. Assume all annotations would be structured in independent sets depending on the time at which certain users first see the idea. And that users belonging to those sets can only see their annotations and no other. This way, every user would get a totally different set of ideas / idea annotations to interact with. Buns/skeletons would add up of course, regardless the parallel bakery they come from.
[link]
|
| |
device for preventing communication? |
|
| |
But I'm not following what you're after. You appear to be describing a personalized, computer-generated version of the Halfbakery. Of which, I completely fail to see the point. |
|
| |
Good plan - you have all the crap ideas
and we'll have all the good ones. |
|
| |
gee thx for the [+] [<insert name of imaginary friend>]. I'm glad you like it. |
|
| |
<edit> oops, sorry guys, that was adressed to someone who I was talking to on another branch of this idea's evolution.</edit> |
|
| |
[Ian], [Dr], thx for waiting me finish editing my idea. You only read the header. Hello? |
|
| |
…er, yes. I hadn't realised you were doing
this one in instalments. |
|
| |
Well, it was my fault for not letting you know actually. I didn't do the same mistake on the other halfbakeries though.. |
|
| |
This would represent a phenomenal
management problem for the haver of
the idea, as they and only they (and
anyone looking over their shoulder)
would see all phases in one unified
juncture. Most people would probably
hit upon similar points, believing that
they were each the first to disclose it, so
you'd probably have many phases of the
same topic thread develop in parallel.
Were there ever to be a leakage from
one phase sector to the next, it'd be like
deja vu all over again. People would
think they're in the familiar
conversational thread, as the points
raised so far would all be similar, and
everything would have a certain
familiarity to it. It'd be like deja vu all
over again. From the point of view of
the hubmaster of the idea package,
you'd have to be responding to near-
identical topic threads over and over
and over. It'd be like a duvet all over
again, not just for Christmas. |
|
| |
The Halfbakery is not nearly as crowded as you think. Start sub-dividing it this way, and *no one* will get to see your precious ideas, or share their fishbones with you. |
|
| |
//The Halfbakery is not nearly as crowded as you think// That's what *you* think! |
|
| |