Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'

h a l f b a k e r y
Not the Happy Cuddle Club.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: Browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

User:
Pass:
Login
Create account.


                                           

Real-World Olympics
A more realistic sport
  (+4, -21)(+4, -21)(+4, -21)
(+4, -21)
  [vote for,
against]


Just like the name suggests: An olympic sport for something that matters. There's currently an olympic sport for target shooting, with a low-caliber rifle equipped with a comically large scope, in perfect weather conditions, at a paper target with lines telling you where to shoot.

Problem with this: Who the Hell cares if you can shoot with a perfect weapon in perfect conditions? When could that ever be put to practical use?

So I suggest shooting with an Uzi from a moving vehicle, at life-size manequins (sp?) that are dressed in clothes. Why? Because this is how people actually shoot in real-world situations.

I'd also want to apply such changes to many other sports.


21 Quest, Jan 20 2006

Olympic Programme Commission http://en.beijing20...icle211996783.shtml
The Olympic body that decides what new sports to include in the Olympics [danpat, Jan 21 2006]

[link]






       I understand why they do it, however the fact is that with the kind of rifles they use *I* could hit a moving fly at 100 yards. Who cares if skilled people are competing if the competition doesn't test their skills? I don't think guns should be in the Olympics because shooting's not a sport. You aim and squeeze a trigger. A child could do it (as evidenced in that link). There is hardly any physical effort required, and the Olympics were designed as a test of physical prowess. If the Olympics are going to allow guns, they should at least make it realistic.

21 Quest, Jan 20 2006
  

       ( If the Olympics are going to allow guns, they should at least make it realistic.)   

       Are you just trolling, [21]? Or have you been hanging out with the MPs again?   

       Most of those of us who pay for our own ammunition don't use Uzis.

normzone, Jan 20 2006
  

       No, I'm talking about the one where they shoot from various positions, but they're not moving.

21 Quest, Jan 20 2006
  

       I suggested Uzis because they're less accurate and therefore require a great deal of skill to hit a target while moving.

21 Quest, Jan 20 2006
  

       Utilizing that logic, we could do derringers at 100 feet.

normzone, Jan 20 2006
  

       Bad guy sprays away with uzi. Cop finds cover, takes a second to aim, squeezes off one 9mm round. Bad guy drops. Accuracy wins.

Freefall, Jan 20 2006
  

       A two-team shooting game, where one team drives a car as bumpily as possible and the *opponent* has to shoot out the window of that same car, would be quite interesting. Then the teams switch.   

       I'd watch it. Assuming the target range was big enough and safe.

phundug, Jan 20 2006
  

       // Who cares if skilled people are competing if the competition doesn't test their skills? //   

       If it doesn't test their skills, then howcome there is always a winner? Everyone who doesn't win must have their skills tested beyond their limit at some point.   

       Now, if this idea was to add skills to the Olympics that aren't currently being tested, then I'd vote neutral, because there is already a processing for making that happen (see link). But because this is just an ill-thought-through rant about shooting lots of stuff with lots of bullets, it's a fish from me.

danpat, Jan 21 2006
  

       //this is how people actually shoot in real-world situations// People who shoot other people in a drive-by with an Uzi should be put in prison, not the olympics. The olympics is about competition for the sake of it, that's why there isn't a "Stock Market Analysis" event, or a "Fix The Leaky Toilet Cistern" event or any other event that relate to practical life-skills. There is a competition for useful life-skills, it's called life.

wagster, Jan 21 2006
  

       A well-aimed caber pole lobbed in the general direction of the poster...

RayfordSteele, Jan 26 2006
  

       I think that halfbaking should be an Olympic Sport. It's specialised, exclusive and interests me. What could be better?

UnaBubba, Jan 26 2006
  

       better? only halfbaking half naked.

xandram, Jan 27 2006
  

       ....with a catapult and a bag of thistle bracts.

skinflaps, Jan 27 2006
  

       //Will we have hordes of woad-tattooed screeching sword and spear wielding clansmen running at entrants in the archery competition?//   

       Nice image, [Murdoch]. I'm warming to your curmudgeonly approach to the world.

UnaBubba, Jan 27 2006
  

       400m runners are given a half-lap start before the hungry cheetahs are unleased.
Hammer-throwers have a handicap based on the lethal radius of the bomb they have to throw.
  

       Hell yeah! Now *that's* entertainment!

21 Quest, Jan 27 2006
  

       Like that Family Guy fake Fox special- "Fast Animals, Slow Children."   

       "Wait up guys, I've spilled honey all over myself!"   

       Is that like, "I wear the pants in my house. My wife just tells me which ones."?

UnaBubba, Jan 30 2006
  

       I'd really want to have a real life situation where I'm flying along in a car, guning down passersby with an Uzi. It'd be much better than sitting at my computer doing this.   

       That would rule.

notmarkflynn, Jan 31 2006
  
      
[annotate]
  


 
back: main index
 business 
 computer 
 culture 
 fashion 
 food 
 halfbakery 
 home 
 other 
 product 
 public 
 science 
 sport 
 vehicle