Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
Contrary to popular belief

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:
pass:
register,


                                                                                 

Schroedinger's Idea

 
(+9, -9)
  [vote for,
against]

theircompetitor, Jun 14 2009

Thomson's Cat Lamp, shedding some light, maybe... Thomson_27s_20Cat_20Lamp
shameless elf promotion. [4whom, Jun 15 2009]

Physics Laboratory Cat Physics_20Laboratory_20Cat
Innovation of the worst sort. [8th of 7, Jun 15 2009]

[link]






       You can' t really know what's here until you look. Who knows. You might yet find a cat in here.
theircompetitor, Jun 14 2009
  

       Buns/Bone equally so
Dub, Jun 14 2009
  

       I'm fairly certain there's only one "e" in "Schrödinger".
Gamma48, Jun 14 2009
  

       does it die eating dried cat food or not?
po, Jun 14 2009
  

       my little claires gone missing...you better not be boxing her up you, you, you...you know what!
blissmiss, Jun 14 2009
  

       What's the half-life of the idea ?
bigsleep, Jun 14 2009
  

       Will the Schrodinghie hold air?   

       this idea may or may not be [marked-for-deletion]
xaviergisz, Jun 14 2009
  

       Well, where's the cat ? The vial of poison and the radioactive source are ready .......   

       BRING ON THE CAT ! BRING ON THE CAT !
8th of 7, Jun 15 2009
  

       I can't bear to look.
coprocephalous, Jun 15 2009
  

       There's a bear in the box, too ? Please don't hurt the bear. We like bears. Just give us the cat, dead or alive, doesn't matter. All we want is the cat. You can keep the bear. If the bear eats the cat, that's fine too.
8th of 7, Jun 15 2009
  

       Someone needs to shed some light on this. I propose a Thomson's Cat Lamp! <shameless elf promotion>.
4whom, Jun 15 2009
  

       You sure it's a bear? Looks like a fox to me.
Ian Tindale, Jun 15 2009
  

       You burn my little claire and I'll see you in hell you murderer. And don't even get me started on the cute little fox. The bear, well the bears on his own...sorry.
blissmiss, Jun 15 2009
  

       [OT slightly] Whilst we're on bears, does observing or not observing whatever it is bears do or don't do in the woods, cause any problems at a quantum level?
Or would you be too busy listening for falling trees?
coprocephalous, Jun 15 2009
  

       The wave function? What other ideas did he have. I don't get this at all. If it's some cute play on the cat in the box thought experiment then I really don't get it. Nothing's potentially dead here.
daseva, Jun 15 2009
  

       // cause any problems at a quantum level //   

       Not as such; but if the park rangers catch you hiding in the undergrowth, painstakingly watching bears having a dump, then you may have some difficult explaining to do to the rangers.the police, the court, and untimately to the psychiatic staff in the institution in which you will inevitably be confined.   

       // Nothing's potentially dead here. //   

       We know. Life's just full of disappointments.
8th of 7, Jun 15 2009
  

       //The wave function? What other ideas did he have.// You must be joking? Or have you just turned a blind (observable) eye? What other ideas do you have to have, after telling everyone that matter and energy don't really exist until you observe them? That is, besides going on to solve quantum harmonic oscillators, and a few questions on diatomic molecules. And then of course motivating J. D. Watson to investigate a double helix. And lastly his work in getting colour defficient vision recognised as a physiological problem and not a mental one.
4whom, Jun 15 2009
  

       Well, you're supporting my argument with all that, so thanks. And you're forgetting 'What is life'. Some of my favorite musings are in that book. And I think the existence puzzle had already been stated by a certain Bohr of a man.
daseva, Jun 15 2009
  

       It wasn't just Bohr; the "Copenhagen Interpretation" is the end result of much interaction between many great physicists of that era, except perhaps for Heisenberg - no-one's quite sure if he was involved or not.
8th of 7, Jun 15 2009
  

       Glad to help [daseva]. "What is Life?" should be mandatory reading, for anyone drawing breath. PS. all of those musings (and subsequent scientific discoveries come from that book)
4whom, Jun 15 2009
  

       "The machine must take over the toil for which man is too good, not man the work for which the machine is too expensive." -- E. Schrodinger. "What is life?"   

       Cheers to anyone who can help explain this quote with real life examples.
daseva, Jun 15 2009
  

       Guthrie's The four colour problem...
4whom, Jun 15 2009
  

       Woody or Arlo?
wagster, Jun 15 2009
  

       Is one of the colours The Colour Purple ?
8th of 7, Jun 15 2009
  

       Where does the sky come from...that's the question I want answered.
blissmiss, Jun 15 2009
  

       We could tell you, but then we'd have to kill you.
8th of 7, Jun 15 2009
  

       <waves>Particle!</waves>
gnomethang, Jun 15 2009
  

       <Particle>Waves!</Particle>
Dub, Jun 15 2009
  

       //" "//
I knew it! I just could keep from looking.
Zimmy, Jun 16 2009
  

       //Where does the sky come from//
That's not the question, the question is "where does it go at night?"
AbsintheWithoutLeave, Jun 16 2009
  

       Hmmm..., then where do stars come from? Why is the sky black at night, and blue during the day. What causes the wind to blow?   

       So many questions, so few answers.
blissmiss, Jun 16 2009
  

       //Why is the sky black at night, and blue during the day//   

       I remember it with the handy saying "Black sky in the evening, its winter, black sky in the morning, solar eclipse."
bigsleep, Jun 16 2009
  

       Very Zen
imho, Jun 16 2009
  

       This doesn't work [-]. As [daseva] noted, there's no uncertainty about it. It is no more an idea than the Ipswich Triptych Styptic Dipstick, whether you observe it or not.
pertinax, Jun 17 2009
  

       Since we already know what Schrödinger's "big" idea was, there is no mystery here, only an extra 'e' in the name.... unless that 'e' happens to stand for the speed of light, and the whole name is some sort of equation.
xenzag, Jun 17 2009
  

       "oe" is the English equivalent of "ö"
theleopard, Jun 17 2009
  

       Only here could a blank space inspire such discussion.
RayfordSteele, Jun 18 2009
  
      
[annotate]
  


 

back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle