h a l f b a k e r y
"Put it on a plate, son. You'll enjoy it more."
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
or Create a new account.
|
|
| Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
| |
could you double up a chess and a checkers game? |
|
| |
Not without substantially altering the rules
of chess. |
|
| |
Say what? Just what is this game about? |
|
| |
the chess pieces could sit on the checkers if they occupy the same square. |
|
| |
the two checkers game - just now fully understood the concept - neat! wish I could double bun the idea. |
|
| |
Ooh. I never thought of that. Kudos for
lateral (erm vertical) thinking. It hurts my
head less, though if I only have one piece
on a square. |
|
| |
In fact, four players could play checkers on one board, if they played perpendicular games. |
|
| |
Brilliant! But you'd have to market it as Xtreme Checkers. |
|
| |
and use 4 colors?, [ldishler] |
|
| |
This sounds pretty fun. Checkers, though deceptively hard with the right opponent, seems a little flat to me. This would liven it up. |
|
| |
We used to play diagonal chess, where all the pieces were lines up in the corners. Needless to say, we never quite figured out how the knight should move. Maybe add diagonal players too. eight colors. Four games. Pure Madness. |
|
| |
I can't believe someone gave this a negative. What's not to like? |
|
| |
Maybe the idea board them. |
|
| |
Brilliant - talk about not seeing the forest for the trees - not seeing half the board for the game pieces! |
|
| |
You would only need 2 colors for this checkers game. Since the board dictates the movement via a given color of a square. |
|
| |
3D Simultaneous drafts... Let Spock and Kirk play that one and remain fashionable |
|
| |