h a l f b a k e r yCompound disinterest.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
This idea was going to be an anno under a recent "fat folks pay more to fly" idea (linked), but that one was appropriately marked for deletion, being a rehash of a similar idea from 2001 (linked).
For plane flights, there should be a sliding ticket scale, and chairs should be adjustable to fit the
occupant. Consider the large passenger - on sitting in the sample seat he takes up 120% of a typical seat. His seat is adjusted to accomodate and his ticket price increased accordingly. Consider the mother with two daughters. Each daughter takes up only 75% of a normal seat, and so their seats are reduced in width, along with the price they pay. An additional 75% normal seat could then be placed in that row. Little kids and very slim folks would pay substantially lower rates for their narrow seats, and converse would be true for the very large. This would be helpful for families travelling with the very old and very young, as these relatives would now be cheaper to bring along. An average person preparing for an expensive $2000 plane trip would have incentive to "make weight" and slim down, hoping to get a 92% normal seat with a corresponding $160 savings. Passengers would also tend to keep pockets empty and wear control girdles, which could be available in airline gift shops.
(?) New fat folks idea.
Fat_20Person_20AirTravel_20Screen [bungston, Dec 15 2006]
Old fat folks idea
Fat_20people_20rows_20in_20coach [bungston, Dec 15 2006]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., http://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
This sounds like a wonderful, very logical middle-ground you've hit upon, bungston. Great job! I imagine this could be done quite easily by making bench seats with sliding armrests. Not sure about safety, or how you'd work out seatbelts (seatbelts could be done just like those used on web seats in military cargo aircraft, so you could just move them around). |
|
| |
Here's some problems, though: |
|
| |
A bench seat sounds less than comfortable for a multi-hour flight (web seats are murder after a few hours). And with adjustable seats there's a safety issue with ensuring there's an in-cieling (sp?) oxygen mask above every seat, and an emergency floatation device beneath each seat. |
|
| |
I like the concept, but I'm not sure if it could work without sacrificing comfort and safety. (neutral) |
|
| |
You will probably still offend fat people somehow. And cause arguments about how big one's seat should be adjusted to, unless you also create some sort of standardized "butt calipers". |
|
| |
I see that argument being easily resolved. Have a standard requirement, each passenger's seat must leave exactly 3 inches between the passenger's body and the armrests (that's not necessarily the ideal measurement, just an idea). |
|
| |