 h a l f b a k e r y RIFHMAO (Rolling in flour, halfbaking my ass off)
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
Login
Create account.
|
|
|
This is an installation for a large gallery
(a
very large gallery) or, more probably, a
salt-plain somewhere.
After walking through the installation for
a
number of hours, you finally spot
something shimmering in the sunlight,
about a mile away. As you head towards
it, you eventually
make out that it's a
sphere of indistinct colour, about a metre
in diameter, on a plinth. As you get
closer, within a few yards and then a few
feet, you find that it's not just one
sphere,
but a cluster of about two hundred
smaller
balls, each the size of an apple.
That's it. That's all there is.
However, after scratching your head for a
while, you notice a small arrow mounted
on the plinth, pointing into the distance
(as almost all arrows do). Hefting your
rucksack, you take careful note of the
arrow's direction, and start walking.
After
a couple of miles, you pass a couple
walking the opposite way, and exchange
a
few words before continuing. You see
no-
one else.
You've been walking for about two and
half hours now, and the exhibit that you
last visited is just the tiniest dot against
the white salt plain.
After three hours, you almost miss the
next part of exhibit, passing a hundred
yards to the side of it before you notice
it's
there. Hastening up to it, you find that
most of the exhibit is actually its plinth -
otherwise you'd have missed it
altogether.
The exhibit itself is actually a single
fuzzy
sphere, about the size of a golfball.
This is getting exhausting, but you're
determined not to miss any of the
installation. There are only another 78
electrons to go, and then a brief 17 mile
jog will take you to the nucleus of the
next atom.
You set off once more, but this time with
a slightly uneasy feeling about the
solidity of the packed-salt floor in which
your wraith-like boots are leaving
footprints. The Particle - The wrong turn that led physics to a dead end
http://www.blazelabs.com/f-p-swave.asp replace those solids with moving waves [xenzag, Mar 10 2008]
[link]
|
| |
Wave at the electrons. [+] |
|
| |
This is quite brilliant, but I'm afraid that the point would be lost on most people. You would only get geeks like me, the odd school science class, and hikers using the exhibit as way-points on a hike.
(Reminds me of a scale model of the solar system I went to once - some 5km long. The sun was the size of a large beach ball.) |
|
| |
Then some joker comes along and add or removes an electron... |
|
| |
//but I'm afraid that the point would be
lost on most people.// That's OK. I think
geeks deserve more and, in any case, they
need to get out. |
|
| |
//Then some joker comes along and add
or removes an electron..// Are you
positive? |
|
| |
I've been through a couple of those solar system exhibits. They are impressive. This should be equally informative, if a bit rough on the ankles. |
|
| |
Err, I make a 1m sphere of gold to weigh 10,107.6kg. |
|
| |
[Neutrino's] is correct in his calculation,
but that is irrelevant. Why do we want a
1m sphere of gold? |
|
| |
By my math, a 5cm-radius sphere only contains 523 cm^3; we'd need about 100,000 cm^3, more like 1/4 of a 1m sphere, not 1/2! |
|
| |
Jutta, a 5cm-radius sphere has a volume
of about 65 cubic centimetres. [EDIT!!
EDIT!! EDIT!! This is very embarrassing,
but you're right. I divided the radius by
two for some reason. Very embarrassing.
Don't tell anyone.] |
|
| |
BUT but but but - the exhibits aren't made
of gold. |
|
| |
Oops, sorry, missed a factor of 10^3 early on! |
|
| |
//BUT but but but - the exhibits aren't made of gold.// |
|
| |
Then why is the idea called "solid gold exhibit"?
[edit - clued in by 78 more electrons to go] OK, I get it. |
|
| |