 h a l f b a k e r y Eureka! Keeping naked people off the streets since 1999.
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
Login
Create account.
|
|
| Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
| |
It's become necessary for me to change ISPs just recently, and I've been giving serious thought to using the username 'Nospam' for just that reason...Didn't know about the 'master' thing, though...is good idea... |
|
| |
how about 'spam-master'...? |
|
| |
'spam-master': should work, but I wouldn't want the connotation of being a master of spam! |
|
| |
<grin> Am considering using 'nospamabuse', so when they delete 'nospam' they end up going straight to my ISP's spam complaint dept... |
|
| |
also effective would be PornosPamela@. |
|
| |
I seem to go through ISPs about once every two years. It's now about two months short of my first annotation up there, and I'm about to change ISPs AGAIN... |
|
| |
How about SpamMeAndDie@bigfoot.com? It may not keep you from getting spam, but maybe someone will think you are putting a hex on them. |
|
| |
As a webmaster, postmaster, abuse, usenet, root email receiver, I would judge by the prodigeous quantity of spam I receive that the "master" measure would not work. The spammers of the world do not seem overly concerned about annoying me. |
|
| |
In fact, I'm convinced that they harvest domain names, and then just prepend all the common account names, such as the ones I listed above, because they know that generally, a human being has to actually read those. |
|
| |
I'm sticking to my proposal to introduce the death penalty for spammers. |
|
| |
A recent correspondent to New Scientist pointed out that some Spam does indeed have its benefits. |
|
| |
Apparently, he took advantage of all the free offers and advice, and now has a 15 foot long penis! |
|
| |