h a l f b a k e r y
The Out-of-Focus Group.
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
or Create a new account.
|
|
| Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Oftentimes in fires it can be difficult for people to see exit signs because of smoke. I would suggest that if there were a standardized flashing pattern for exit signs, it would be possible for people to see and recognize the flashing in visibility conditions which would otherwise make detection difficult.
There are three factors in favor of flashing:
(1) While a fire may make it difficult to notice the solid red glow of an exit sign, it is unlikely that the fire or anything else would be mistaken for the exit sign's particular flashing pattern; even if the smoke was too dense for the word "EXIT" to be read, knowing that the exit was there would suffice.
(2) Flashing objects are more effective at grabbing attention than steadily-lit objects of the same brightness, but can often be made brighter than steadily-lit objects.
(3) If the exit signs included battery backup units, flashing would require much less power than steady illumination for a given level of visibility.
Directional Sound Evacuation system
http://www.soundalert.com
Does what it says on the tin [oneoffdave, Oct 05 2004, last modified Oct 17 2004]
Short name, e.g., Bob's Coffee
Destination URL.
E.g., http://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
Well, the flashing might be a good idea, but how would you make it trigger? I assume you don't want the sign flashing all the time. Perhaps it should be wired to the same system that triggers the fire alarm? |
|
| |
Mind you, talking about the alarm system. Shouldn't the exit sign have a distinctive sound as well, so that visually impaired (and those blinded by smoke) have a better chance navigating towards it. |
|
| |
By the way, in Sweden (and I think other countries as well), the EXIT-signs are green, not red) |
|
| |
In Europe all 'safe-state' signs (those relating to exits, refuges, first aid and the like) are green. Red is reserved for signs relating to fire fighting equipment. |
|
| |
The frequency of the flashing would have to be carefully selected to avoid triggering photo-sensitive epilepsy. |
|
| |
Some researchers at Leeds uni (I think) have devised an exit system that uses sound to guide people out of the building. |
|
| |
When I was in London, green EXIT signs indicated exit routes which were available to the general public for egress at all times. Red EXIT signs indicated exit routes which were only available to the general public in case of emergency, and were often accompanied by non-illuminated yellow "Way Out" signs which indicated the recommended non-emergency mode of egress. |
|
| |
In France they say SORTIE, which I thought meant bathroom. So I went through the Sortie door and found myself outside, blinking in the sunlight. I figured it was the men’s room. |
|
| |
I have seen "fire alarm" strobes, but often not associated with exit signs. I am aware of no standard which indicates that a particular flash pattern (e.g. two rapid [pause] two rapid [pause] one rapid [pause]) will be used on exit signs and nowhere else. |
|
| |
If the sign only relied on its shape for people to tell that it was an actual exit and not just another strobe, it would be worthless in smoke. All new alarm systems are required to use code three (three short tones) for fire. It shouldn't be too hard to work out an international symbol for the flashing signs. Triggering shouldn't be too hard, just wire it on the same circuit as the horns/bells/speakers. As for sound, I suggest a loudspeaker that shouts "Exit! Exit! Exit!". Another thing you might want to do would be to add light strips on the floors that only come on during the alarm, that guide people to the exits. |
|
| |