h a l f b a k e r y
Get half a life.
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
or Create a new account.
|
|
|
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
This would be like a computer braile where you dont run your hand down a line of text but "pixles" pop out of the interface under your resting hand. "G" could be the end of the thumb since it is made low in the throat. The heel of the hand could be "C" etc and the tip of the index finger is "P". And
the other hand could read vowells. Then once you learned the language you could "talk" to someone else by pressing your hands together and applying the right presure.
Annotation:
|
| |
Think I'll stick to ASL. (Actually, I won't since I don't know sign language either.) |
|
| |
It makes sense that by stimulating different parts of the hand in different ways one might be able to "hear" speech (and other types of sounds as well) using nerves in the hand. I doubt that it would work to "talk" using this method, since there are many fewer muscles than nerves in the hand, but if someone learns to "hear" others using this device, they can also "hear" themselves. This ought to make learning to talk much easier for a deaf person. You might even be able to get rid of the typical deaf person accent. |
|
| |
Sign language is good, but this technology (if it worked) could allow deaf people to interact much easier with hearing society. If it could be introduced early enough (incorporate it into some baby toy), a child might be able to learn to speak at a normal age. Imagine a baby holding this device and curiously exploring the different sensations it gave as they make different sounds. Imagine their delight as they hold this with one hand, and pound on a toy piano with the other... |
|
| |