h a l f b a k e r y
Tastes richer, less filling.
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
Login
Create account.
|
|
| Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
| |
//The piping and holes would have to be tiny to allow only fractions of air into canister //
So you could suck in, say, only oxygen molecules? |
|
| |
Someone else proposed something like a can of vacuum recently. Such a thing would run out of suction power so quickly, it's not even worth considering. |
|
| |
Put a motor in the can, and keep sucking the air out. Oh, wait, that's a hoover. |
|
| |
It would work the first time. |
|
| |
//keep sucking//
The canister must be large to be used in this manner. Tanks on a backpack, evacuated by a manual pump, might produce a suitable vacuum. But for items that don't stick to your suction cup you'll also need a litter spike handy. |
|
| |
[Coprocephalous] with the right filter .
[DrCurry] nano engineering . Motor weight versus a can of vacuum .
[Amos Kito] you are right . Porous stuff is a failure point . |
|
| |
The canister , I dreamed up , would be like an negative aerosol can . They would be made in a factory to produce a very very rarefied space and be used for any purpose . |
|
| |
I suppose stucker could go the AA battery way with gecko
foot filament tech .( stick to everything ? ) |
|
| |
I suppose I could make a tiny rubber hand on the end of the pole that deforms under the vacuum to grip the item :-) |
|
| |