h a l f b a k e r y
Loading tagline ....
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
or Create a new account.
|
|
| Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
| |
What are you degrading here? Enemy fortifications, or something? |
|
| |
// mass production of shells easy // |
|
| |
Easy perhaps, but not cheap. This is not cost-effective at all, and is very dangerous since you'd have bullets ricocheting all over the place. Sorry, not a good idea. - |
|
| |
Better to be blasting the shit out of the rockface than out of Shiites or Sunnis or American soldiers, methinks. + |
|
| |
//Better to be blasting the shit out of the rockface // You mean like statues of the Buddha? [-] |
|
| |
I don't even understand what this idea is. [-] |
|
| |
Could be handy in some tight spaces where you can't swing a hammer, but still stick in a gun barrel. |
|
| |
//Is a 'mass hit' or 'explosion hit' better for rock cutting ?// |
|
| |
Depends. You get 2D+4 for your standard bullet, and then you need to know the HP of the wall. |
|
| |
Does it have any magical armour we should know about? |
|
| |
I don't think these chisel-faced bullets will interact well with rifled gun barrels... |
|
| |
Which isn't a problem if you're not trying to snipe the rock face from half a mile. It does, however, preclude the ammunition being used for less peaceful purposes. |
|
| |
Not sure of the use for this though; I'd suggest it might be quite expensive. |
|
| |
//Could be handy in some tight spaces where you can't swing a hammer, but still stick in a gun barrel.// |
|
| |
please tell me you were joking, [kbeckham]. |
|
| |
I like this idea as a means of producing sculpture. I posted an idea once about using shotguns and spraypaint to produce art, but deleted after I realized I had probably read about William Burrough's endeavors in this medium, then half remembered it as my own idea. |
|
| |
I can imagine a project in which a soft substrate is used (soapstone? alabaster? sandstone? wax? plastic? ) and carved using bullets. Each piece would be rendered (in all senses) with a different caliber weapon. There would be a lot of trial and error. One might want to use a tripod. |
|
| |
Thought (or lack of it..)
The bullet would have a tip like a pick but its
weight is such that on impact fall off centre to chip out rock . The bullet body would be hard enough to get to the rockface but soft enough to transfer weight and deform to counter ricochet . |
|
| |
more targeted than blasting , human shaped tunnels .
more fun ???
If rock is the source , shouldn't we open up more of it . |
|
| |
I think you'd be quite surprised at how precise blasting can be. How do you think they carved the faces in Mt. Rushmore? |
|
| |
Dynamite...then concrete. |
|
| |