h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
I'd like to see what would happen if people could only vote for or against halfbakery ideas.
Neutral Vote
Neutral_20Vote My earlier request for an additional state in the voting. [st3f, Jan 24 2006]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
|
As far as I am aware, what you are
asking for is already the status
quo. People can only vote 'for' or
'against' halfbakery ideas. There is no
'neutral' vote. You can choose *not* to
vote
but that is not the same thing. (as far as
I am aware, the 'neutral' button simply
removes your earlier positive or
negative vote.) |
|
|
...unless you are looking to force people
to vote. What would you do to
force them? Chain them
to
their keyboards until they vote? |
|
|
Chains, my bakers got me locked up in chains
And they ain't the kind
that you can see
Woh, it's chains of love
got a hold on me, yeah |
|
|
So far everyone feels emphatically neutral about this idea. |
|
|
What happens if we dip this one in a alkaline solution? |
|
|
Momentary confusion: for a seecond or so I thought you meant if people could *only* vote for or against halfbakery ideas. My first thought: who's going to do my shopping for me? |
|
|
//I'd like to see what would happen if people could only vote for or against halfbakery ideas// |
|
|
Like, no annotations, either? 'Twould certainly save some time ;) |
|
|
So no 'unvote' button then? Sorry [shinobi], [-]. |
|
|
I'm neutral on this one... |
|
|
What vote position would be the default or pre-condition? |
|
|
Maybe you have to vote before you can see the idea. |
|
| |