Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
Assume a hemispherical cow.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:
pass:
register,


                       

the insta-charging marketing campaign

a new rechargeable battery business based on developing battery dependant products that can be recharged in under 1 minute
 
(+3, -3)
  [vote for,
against]

first , let me emphasize that i have been a long time fan of electric accesories and of the idea of electric cars one day getting big. but as everyone knows, and some like to deny, batteries are the big limitation.

ive been thinking of ways to egg on new public and private attention to this problem. god knows there are enough entrepreneurs and techies working on developing the worlds best battery or ultra capacitor. but i was thinking what needs to be done from a marketing perspective, what new thing?

i think the public wants good battery life generally, and you can see that laptop and cell phone batteries are marginally improving and that these improvements are scooped up , unremarkably, by consumers as they buy new products including these improved batteries. furhter along this line, as more hybrid vehicles are purchased , each new generation includes better and better batteries. some day, plug in hybrids and full electrics may actually gain some modicum of popularity as battery performance improves enough to make electric cars chareable beyond the distance and range of ones daily commute.

however, what about the idea of getting people excited about something new in order to just get new creative and consumer idea juices going. i propose the insta charge project. the goal of the project is to make ultra capacitor/battery technologies that make it possible to charge a device(s) fully from a conventional outlet in a wall within one minute.

one might first ask how is this different than rechargeable batteries answer: no planning is involved...the devices that need to be invented must work so that a person can plug in anywhere and recharge instantaneously.

now, this may limit the scope of applications, furthermore, this may require certain new technologies to be engineered that dont quite exist yet, but the general idea is to use existing possible technologies to set up a line of electronic products specially designed (perhaps with ultra efficient electronics) to be charged up very very fast. perhaps the line of devices must all be outfitted with a special charging device ( special adaptor that coverts to higher volatage?) perhaps use ultra capacitors rather than batteries, and perhaps be designed with ultra low energy consumption electronic chips,

but the idea is to market these class of devices as useful as an ordinary device but chareable within one minute. i think it could change the idea of how people use electronics, perhaps even making rechargeables obsolote for consumers attracted to the insta -charge line of electronic products.

sounds quirky, but i like the theme. and ultimately, one of the big problems with batteries is not just the total energy denisty and capacity, but the time it takes to charge.

zevkirsh, Dec 16 2008

Google search for Nanotube Supercapacitor http://www.google.c...ercapacitor&spell=1
A high surface area capacitor. [phoenix, Dec 17 2008]

[link]






       Battery charging rarely uses the full power of a mains connection. I'm all for batteries able to charge at 1500W. Forget about stately procession of ions; let's go for the deluge so strong that even mis-routed ions get pulled into the right place....
vincevincevince, Dec 16 2008
  

       "...what about the idea of getting people excited about something new in order to just get new creative and consumer idea juices going."
Is that really an idea?
  

       Also, I've linked to the concept of the nanotube supercapacitor, which is essentially the device you're looking for. There are a couple different groups working on them right now.
phoenix, Dec 17 2008
  

       i think the comments up until now are focussing on the techonology. this is a business marketing campaign. focussed on finding a target group like travellers that likes ot charge things quickly on the go.   

       this isnt directly about the techonology. its about finding a marketing strategy. so please, future commenters and voters. address this aspect of the idea.
zevkirsh, Dec 18 2008
  

       Marketing things that don't exist is called science fiction, and is not for the Halfbakery.
Spacecoyote, Dec 18 2008
  

       well... "business science fiction".   

       Pointless though, advertising is for stuff that isn't selling well, already.
FlyingToaster, Dec 18 2008
  

       Actually advertising something that doesn't exist is called "fraud".
FlyingToaster, Dec 18 2008
  

       Or first round venture capital
BunsenHoneydew, Dec 18 2008
  

       yea, the whole electric car thing,   

       ala...zap cars and such is a fraud, but sometimes, you got to believe in things to make them happen. and in so far as there is a proven demand for recharcheable batteries and high density fast charging electronic devices. i think there is proof of a market segment of early adopters that can be a succesful niche purchaser for this campaign.   

       and put the al gore seal of approval on it too!
zevkirsh, Dec 18 2008
  

       Putting the Al Gore seal of approval on it may be difficult, or non-eco friendly. The main reason electric cars were dumped was for environmental reasons.   

       While it is true that the electric car produces no emissions, the energy to run them has to come from somewhere, and is about the same as (or slightly more than) a regular car.   

       Regular, and hybrid cars run on gasoline. Electric cars run on electricity from the power grid. 90% of electricity from the power grid comes from the combustion of fossil fuels, about two thirds of which is coal. The other 10% comes from a bit of nuclear, and "renewable sources," In this case, "Renewable sources" are about 1/4 solar or wind, and 75% burning of renewable resources, including trees, biowaste, methane from biowaste, and garbage, including tires, which in my mind should go under fossil fuels, considering their source...   

       What it all boils down to is that gasoline cars use fossil fuels, but due to transmission loss, inefficiency, and dirtier source fuels, electric cars use fossil fuels too, indirectly, and pollute more, unless you're charging them with off-the grid renewable sources you've provided yourself.
ye_river_xiv, Dec 19 2008
  

       Yes, but with an electric car the pollution is the power plant's problem, not mine.
Spacecoyote, Dec 19 2008
  
      
[annotate]
  


 

back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle