h a l f b a k e r yThis ain't rocket surgery.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Big Pharma Dharma Law
A new law to be passed that states that
ANYONE can prescribe ANYTHING at any
dosage for anybody, based on no apparent
logical reasoning or proof of the need for
said prescription.
This way, big Pharma sales will skyrocket
beyond their already ballistic levels,
causing
the debt bubble to finally,
irrevocably explode, causing the whole
world population to go into a state of
mass hysteria, along with serious cases of
PTSD, OCD, ADHD, ADD, DMD, Schizo-
affective disorder, Bipolar2, Borderline
Personality Disorder, Schizophrenia,
Multiple Personality Disorder(each split-
off personality having its own disorder),
fucking Tourettes Syndrome cunt,
Dystonia, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's,
Epilepsy,
Alcoholism, Trichotillomania,
Misophonia(please stop typing the
clicking is driving me crazy), and last and
least, Autism, all of which will require
further lengthy prescriptions of even more
Big Pharma drugs, which will send sales
into exponentially ballistic orbit, which
may alert some extraterrestrial presence
to humanity's loopy plight, and initiate an
Alien landing to end all alien landings. .
Hopefully said aliens will have a response
to Big Pharma that will put it out of action
at last.
Oh crap I forgot to take my
Diazeploricum bellincteri
flouroxetinamidan
ophericatonicaliphoderal again. Hence
this nutzy post.
[link]
|
| |
Well, this is an excellent rant. |
|
| |
It's also an excellent idea - we don't need any new drugs, and we should just let people die as nature intended. |
|
| |
Are you, by any chance, [rcarty] or [jesushchrist] posting under a nom de gloom? |
|
| |
Well now, Max, that would be telling.
So I'll tell.
Woof woof woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof-woof.
(I knew you'd understand that, Max). |
|
| |
Well, welcome or welcome back, whichever. |
|
| |
Nah, he writes better than jhc. Bun for "fucking
tourettes syndrome cunt" |
|
| |
Does this law also apply to the Dalai Llama? What about farmers? |
|
| |
Only if they're from Parma. |
|
| |
[Eddie] has gone quiet. For that matter, has anyone heard from [JHC] of late? |
|
| |
Well, presumably his father, since they're 33% (66% ? 50% ?) the same consciousness. |
|
| |
It depends where you stand on the monophysite - dyophysite controversy, although the Council of Chalcedon is generally considered definitive. |
|
| |
// Hopefully said aliens will have a response to Big Pharma that will put it out of action at last. // |
|
| |
Unlikely, since they're major shareholders. |
|
| |
They ARE?
Oh yes, of course they are!
How could I miss the obvious. Yes. So called 'extra-
terrestrials' are straight from the dark side. Just as all Big
PHARMA (why does my iPad insist on CAPITALISING that?) is
straight out of satan's ball bag.
The thing that really gets me wondering though, is this:
If one had a choice between Batman and the Joker,
knowing, as one does, that Batman is practically 'doomed'
to win at the end of the day, would one choose the
Joker...?
Or any other substitute for Batman, for that matter?
(Riddler, Penguin, whatever one's
tradition/upbringing/birth affiliation suggests)...
Really? One would reject Batman, the obvious winner, in
favour of some dodgy substitute that promises one an
'obligation free' pass into power and glory, simply because
Batman requires the not so readily forthcoming qualities of
integrity, honesty, humility and repentance? Really?
That's what I think of anyone who chooses anything other
than the light. To put it plainly: Jesus Christ.
Capische? Lol! Lots of love
Edie |
|
| |
Is that your own testimony, or just the Diazeploricum bellincteri
flouroxetinamidan ophericatonic aliphoderal talking? |
|
| |
pertinax you biscuit! it must be the cookies talking...
testimonies are for the byrds
...there is a time, turn, turn, turn...there is a season, turn,
turn turn... |
|
| |
Well, at least it's not in - oh, my mistake. |
|
| |
In? IN? Is everybody IN? The ceremony is about to begin! |
|
| |
(I'm in thru the outdoor, in with the outcrowd,
In for a penny, in for a soundcloud) |
|
| |
[Eddie], just out of curiosity, (a) do you believe that any
new drugs are of any use at all? and (b) who do you think
develops new drugs to the point of clinical application? |
|
| |
// who do you think develops new drugs to the point of clinical application? // |
|
| |
Ahh, we know this one ... it's the Belgians, isn't it ? They're so desperate to find some advanced pharmacology to alleviate the misery of subsisting in the festering mire of their failed bicultural pseudostate that they're prepared to commit 68.37% of their GDP* to developing new neuroleptics. |
|
| |
*29.31% of their GDP goes on existing pharmacology; the remainder they squander on actually running their pathetic excuse for a country. |
|
| |
Hmm ... [MaxwellBuchanan], have you *actually* failed to notice
the gender-significant single "d" of [Edie] (usually short for Edith),
or are you just pretending to have failed to notice it, as a tease? |
|
| |
Ah - I can see that it's time I gave my monocle a good clean.
But I thought that, in another post here in this very
disestablishment, we had deduced that [Edie] was more
likely to be an Eddie than an Edie? |
|
| |
Well, it is possible that he/she too is teasing us, in turn, which would be fair in the circumstances. |
|
| |
Maxwell.
For maximum wellness, a combination of SOME
pharmaceuticals (mostly the newer ones, but the older
ones also work for some) and a positive outlook, as well as
a sound belief system, and a moderate amount of physical
activity...AND something at least semi-fun to do ( like
aiming cheeseballs at your neighbour's cup of coffee on the
balcony of the flat one floor below you) are necessary ...oh
and dont forget to eat lots of bananas or at least something
off a tree sometimes, too. It's easy, mkay? |
|
| |
As to who develops new drugs...well...anyone with a pet
rat and a bit of imagination can try.
For example, my rats seem to be happy with a
smorgasboard of mini-buffets of every kind of food
available, except caviar and lobster, which I can't really
afford at the moment, and some sawdust and a private
place to mate, and fresh water. Oh and i think they like
music, too. And because theyre kept on a shelf in the
corner of the bathroom, they also get plenty of free human
porn.
How to synthesise all that into a drug is still a bit beyond
me.
Perhaps if I mix sawdust with an array of delicious fresh
foods and some water, add a bit of rat muscaline, a page
torn from a Hustler mag or suchlike, and some rat-sweat,
and distill it all in a moonshine maker set to vibrate to the
frequencies of Deep Purple, I'll hit the jackpot and turn out
a drug that keeps - if not humans, at least rats - happy,
content, placid, amused, semi-curious, affectionate,
perfectly conditioned, bright-eyed, silky-tailed, and
moderately active....
I think I'll call it HuskerPip* as that is a combination of my
two delightful little rodents' names. |
|
| |
//As to who develops new drugs...well...anyone with a
pet rat and a
bit of imagination can try.// |
|
| |
Don't be a twat, mate, at least no more than you can
help. |
|
| |
Point one: it's the people with pet rats and imagination
who _do_
already discover either new drugs, new drug classes, or
relevant drug
targets. They're called scientists, and I have worked with
some of the
best and brightest. |
|
| |
Point two: very few people with imagination and a pet rat
have the
approximately $1bn it takes to develop the drug, run it
through tests
in cell culture, then in large numbers of rats that have an
analogue of
the disease it's meant to treat, then through healthy
human
volunteers, then through a small cohort of patients, then
through a
larger cohort; and then to say "oh well" when, like most
new drugs, it
ultimately fails on grounds of efficacy or safety, and then
go back and
start all over again. |
|
| |
I believe that they're called scientists. |
|
| |
Good point. Must have been a birdstrike. |
|
| |
// go back and start all over again. // |
|
| |
Unless, of course, you've come up with a performance-enhancer that works well and WADA can't detect. |
|
| |
In which case, an unspecified but substantial reward probably awaits you - however, fame probably isn't going to be a part of it. |
|
| |
It'll be interesting to see what happens when genetic
enhancements for athletes become available. Short of
compelling all athletes to produce their parents for DNA
testing, there's not a lot you can do about it. |
|
| |
We fear you are a trifle behind the curve, there. |
|
| |