Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
Romantic, but doomed to fail.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:
pass:
register,


                 

Fingerprint Fire Alarm Call Point

It was YOU ...
  (+3, -1)
(+3, -1)
  [vote for,
against]

Looks like a conventional fire alarm call point - "Break Glass, Push Button".

The head of the pushbutton is a fingerprint reader cell. When the button is pressed, it scans for a fingerprint. If the button is being pressed with something that's not a finger (pen, stick, gloved hand) then the unit sends a "Tamper" signal to the main panel.

If a fingerprint pattern is detected, then the alarm sounds, but the scan data is transmitted via the wiring back to the control panel and stored in a thermally-hardened flash drive, or transmitted externally via a WAN.

This will deter malicious false alarms.

8th of 7, Jun 04 2011

Fire alarm Fire_20alarm
Inspired by [spider]'s annotation. [8th of 7, Jun 06 2011]

Please log in.
If you're not logged in, you can see what this page looks like, but you will not be able to add anything.
Short name, e.g., Bob's Coffee
Destination URL. E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)






       Lots of people, I suspect, are nervous about breaking glass, and would tend to pull their cuffs over their fingers to activate the alarm.   

       Simpler (and probably cheaper) to have a cheap cell-phone style camera in each fire alarm. When the alarm is pressed, the camera takes a photo.   

       If the building (and the cameras) burn down, then it wasn't a false alarm and you don't really need to know who triggered it.
MaxwellBuchanan, Jun 04 2011
  

       I like both this and MaxwellBushanan's idea (the one with the camera)
Dickcheney6, Jun 05 2011
  

       Simpler (and probably cheaper) to rig the button to a large incendiary charge, so the building burns down anyway, thus eliminating false alarms.
spidermother, Jun 05 2011
  

       That we like.
8th of 7, Jun 05 2011
  

       [+] spidermother.
FlyingToaster, Jun 05 2011
  

       Could also have a insulin style spring loaded needle. Taking a DNA sample, photo and finger print would make it easier to identify people. If it was a real fire, could also have a sound recorder to record their last words... Just in case of course...
saedi, Jun 06 2011
  

       I feel like this is actually a harmful idea. The whole point behind a fire alarm is that it's a quick way to alert everyone in a building of a fire. Take away the "quick" aspect with a fingerprint scan, and you're removing seconds of time that could mean someone's life.   

       I can think of a handful of situations where this could be dangerous: your hands are sooty/otherwise dirty, or covered in protective gear, you don't have time to stand for the scan because of the danger involved, a poor scan or perhaps someone without finger prints (super irony points awarded if it's because you're a burn victim), smoke or soot obscures scanner before the finger can be pressed...   

       It's a nice idea behind the invention, but I wouldn't want one where I work.
notmarkflynn, Jun 07 2011
  


 

back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle