h a l f b a k e r yCall Ambulance, Rebuild Kitchen.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
login
|
|
|
It's very common for fluorescent items to have a specific and unusual function. For instance, emergency vehicles, hi-vis vests, certain chemicals for cleansing or other special purposes, strip lighting used in commercial premises. Medicines are often also coloured in a particular way to ease identification
and prevent confusion with foodstuffs. This also includes budgerigars. Jewellery can also be fluorescent in the sense of emitting more visible light than it absorbs, for instance diamonds.
There may well be an unusually wide overlap between fluorescent products and those on which sales tax/GST/VAT is not paid. Hi-vis gear is generally bought for use in workplaces or only worn for paid work; jewellery has as I understand it always been zero-rated; medicines are too; emergency vehicles I'm guessing are also exempt; strip-lighting tends to be used more in places of business; businesses must get through more cleaning products per capita than in the home because of the need for presentation, health and safety regulations and the like.
Moreover, fluorescent products are easier to see than non-fluorescent ones, and therefore easier to detect.
Therefore, the two should be made coextensional. Everything fluorescent should be zero-rated and everything non-fluorescent should have VAT levied on it. This has at least three peculiar consequences: budgerigars become exempt from sales tax, which might encourage budgie-hoarding for money-laundering purposes; all non-luxury food items now have to be fluorescent; any service exempt from sales tax also now has to be somehow fluorescent too in a manner I cannot fully understand. Also, any clothes which have GST levied on them would become exempt from that once washed in non-Brand X detergents, making charity shop clothes much more likely to be exempt.
It might also become possible for a VAT inspector to calculate the VAT on a business premise simply by entering it after dark, illuminating it with a UV light, capturing an image of the "glowing" items and comparing it to an image taken under conventional lighting.
|
| |
I thought this was how it already worked? |
|
| |
I was today old when I learned the word budgerigars. Had to look it up. Are there other 'gar' ending bird names which have been shortened for so long that the general public only knows the slang names? |
|
| |
If there were, you would probably find them in Australia; etymonline says 'budgerigar(n.) small Australian parrot, 1847, from a native Australian language, said to mean "good cockatoo," from budgeri "good" + gar "cockatoo."' |
|
| |
However, in order to find them, you might have to track down which particular "native Australian language" it was, and that particular language might not have survived from 1847 to the present day. The language where I live is variously call Noongar, Nyungar or [some other spellings], but I hadn't heard that *that* "-gar" had to do with cockatoos or any other birds. |
|
| |
It's the glory of the sheer Australianicity of the full name that I wallow in, [2 fries]. I expect there are other "-gars" and there are also garfish of course, whose bones are apparently green, maybe also fluorescent and therefore also zero-rated. |
|
| |
BTW, it was borne in upon me that other parrots are also fluorescent, so it'd also apply to them. |
|
| |
//It might also become possible for a VAT inspector to calculate the VAT on a business premise simply by entering it after dark//
In my experience, calculating things is not really the strongpoint of VAT Inspectors. They are more inclined to pluck a number out of the air & dare you to waste your time challenging it.
On the other hand though, I used to be acquainted with a number of people who were particularly adept at entering premises after dark. It makes me happy to think that they could finally find a salaried employment that would make use of their finely honed skills. |
|
| |
Would it apply to items zero rated for VAT, or only VAT exempt? |
|
| |
Not sure about a world where Jaffa cakes and Marks and Spencers chocolate covered teacakes are required to be fluorescent. Though, hey, I'd give it a go. [+] |
|
| |
Sometimes things are fluorescent without appearing to be so, and it's possible that Jaffa cakes would be. I haven't tried, but I think I'd like them to be. |
|
| |