h a l f b a k e r yWe have a low common denominator: 2
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
sounds good to me.
That would stop me having to add new words to my filter every day. |
|
|
I would like to make a suggestion.
Why not add a part that makes it easy to get back to the person that is sending the junk and then at least we could then send all their junk back. |
|
|
//Please don't take this the wrong way, and welcome, but could you invest in a couple of commas?// This annotation proves that [blissmiss] is human and is permitted to participate in discussions at this web site. An automated grammar checker would have found that more than a couple of commas is missing. |
|
|
As long as you're not worried about the millions of people using a text environment... maybe an ASCII art contingency? |
|
|
([bliss]'s grammar clearance sale could probably include a few paragraph breaks, too.) |
|
|
I've been toying with the same idea for some time (except without the @@ business). The distorted words are 'CAPTCHA's, by the way.
There are several finicky little problems you need to solve.
1) Blind people need to be able to pass the test. One possibility is an audio version, but this is much more tricky without a very standard format like jpeg.
2) As Detly pointed out, text-onlies
3) emails you should let in without testing. My method involved storing a pass-list for addresses which had either passed a test, or you had sent email to. Of course this doesn't help for organisations where you email one address and receive a reply from another. Mailing lists you've subscribed to, for example. |
|
|
Unfortunately it doesn't look like I'll make my fortune from this idea, anyway. |
|
| |