Culture: Television: Channel
Books On TV   (+3, -4)  [vote for, against]
For people without hands

I have hands, but just imagine if you didn't! how would you perform everday tasks? such as typing, or even reading a book (with no hands to turn the pages you'd never get past the cover, or even get the book from the shelf)...sure you could hire a helper or marry ugly but who has the time and money for that? if only there was a tv station that would show books all day...the pages could be turned for you...sure you'd have to have someone set the channel for you but once you've tuned in there's no reason to tune out...

reading rainbow came close...but it was tough to trust those kids, and lavar burton wasn't always easy on the eyes...I know if i lost my hands i would love to have a channel like this
-- gniterobot, Aug 21 2002

Amazing Feats of Armless People http://welcome.to/fingertoes
Look ma, no hands. [jutta, Aug 21 2002]

aah... MOVIES!
-- Mr Burns, Aug 21 2002


Everyone knows the movie is never as good as the book...but don't take my word for it
-- gniterobot, Aug 21 2002


I agree, those kids always seemed to like the books they were reading. I sense publishing industry propaganda.
-- ImBack, Aug 21 2002


1) not everyone reads at the same rate
2) The TV won't display at a high enough resolution.
-- yamahito, Aug 21 2002


yamahito: They always could scroll at the same speed as the TV Guide channel.. even people that can't read can keep up at that pace
-- Mr Burns, Aug 21 2002


Watching a screen for a long time hurts the eyes. Far better to give your armless friends an automatic page-turner.
-- calum, Aug 22 2002



random, halfbakery