Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register. Please log in or create an account.
Fashion: Underwear: Temperature
Breezy Boxers   (+3, -1)  [vote for, against]
The one-eyed snake in a one-legged fly

The brief description: To keep male members cool as cucumbers and hanging free as drying salami, instead of in on a limb, these boxer shorts have a third, lesser leg, front and center. Thanks to the extra piping on this smart, satin underwear you can pee hands-free and swing easily as a clapper in the bantam bell bottom.
-- FarmerJohn, Jul 13 2003

(?) view without pants http://www.geocitie...nie/aeroboxers.html
[FarmerJohn, Oct 04 2004, last modified Oct 21 2004]

YOUnique Boutique's colleciton... http://www.younique...ower/novelties.html
...of Male Power Novelty Underwear. Take your pick. [phoenix, Oct 04 2004, last modified Oct 21 2004]

(?) for 'Bubba, sans tusks http://www.lingerie...eys/412/412_200.jpg
[thumbwax, Oct 04 2004, last modified Oct 05 2004]

Well, golly I do like that alot. Plus again.
-- sartep, Jul 13 2003


Kramer: “I’m out there, Jerry, and I’m loving every minute of it.”
-- Shz, Jul 13 2003


These boxers are quite inventive, but leave much to the imagination. They're not very versitile, either. What happens when you wlak quickly/briskly? You dont want that baby's arm flapping between your legs. Stick to the boxer/breifs, men.
-- throwflamingrocks, Jul 13 2003


Brilliant!
-- silverstormer, Jul 13 2003


Surely your trousers (pants) would need to be similarly styled to allow free circulation? Of air, that is.
-- egbert, Jul 13 2003


I'll style 'em if you wear 'em.
-- FarmerJohn, Jul 13 2003


What, no tusks?
-- thumbwax, Jul 13 2003


Those are called front end loaders.
-- Tiger Lily, Jul 13 2003


Depends on your point of view.
-- egbert, Jul 14 2003


//pee hands-free//: Not first thing in the morning! (I'm not going to have to explain this, am I?)
-- Cedar Park, Jul 14 2003


Please don't.
-- egbert, Jul 14 2003


Guys, if you had wood first thing in the morning ... wouldn't the shorts ... you know ... let too much go?
-- throwflamingrocks, Jul 14 2003


maybe, but in that case, no pair of men's underthings would be any help
-- oxen crossing, Jul 14 2003


Either gauche or adroit would certainly be more than obvious in these.
-- egbert, Jul 14 2003


<Dr. Lily> Weeell now, how's your old popeyed pappy gettin' along these days?
-- Tiger Lily, Jul 14 2003


Trying to stop laughing at [egbert]'s anno. People here are looking at me. snickersnicker
-- squeak, Jul 15 2003



random, halfbakery