When you hang a picture using the standard “wire-attached-to-the-frame” mount, it tends to lean forward so there's a gap between the top edge and the wall. If the wire were attached to the frame via spring-loaded recoilers, it would pull the wire taut after hanging, making the picture flush with the wall.
-- ytk, Sep 27 2013

Keyed Wall Bracket http://www.organize...nger-for-canvas.asp
This type of wall bracket also works well at keeping your picture tightly affixed to the wall but is slightly more difficult to install and/or remove than the single nail hanger and wire system. Also takes care of any self-leveling problems when properly installed. [jurist, Sep 29 2013]

That is not such a bad idea. The recoilers (and string) could be recessed relative to the back of the picture.
-- MaxwellBuchanan, Sep 27 2013


(+) Some people will certainly like this. Me, my pictures hang forward avoiding most dust. Self leveling would be a plus, though.
-- cudgel, Sep 27 2013


Wouldn't the spring-loaded recoilers also pull the wire taut BEFORE hanging?
-- AusCan531, Sep 28 2013


Presumably, you'd pull out the wire with one hand like a bowstring to get it onto the hook.

Attaching the wire near the front of the frame also helps. In fact, even with a retractable wire, you'll need to attach it somewhat forward. Even tensioned wires sag somewhat.
-- spidermother, Sep 28 2013


What's wrong with screwing the picture to the wall like they do in pubs?
-- pocmloc, Sep 28 2013


Many of us who regularly paint get around the self-flushing issue by using a frame which is more deeply rabbeted on its back side. The deep sides allow it to hang properly on the wall without tilting using standard wire.
-- jurist, Sep 29 2013


I don't want to know what sort of sick things you do with those poor little bunnies.
-- ytk, Sep 29 2013



random, halfbakery