h a l f b a k e r yOpen other side.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
AFM tip more sensitive than a single atom
as amorphous elemental materials Cr as well as Zn may "have" the same density Thus just one Zn atom at the tip of a Cr AFM tip has higher resolution as e- perturbations are particular to that atoms quantum states | |
sometimes a pile of atoms looks like a bunch of round things Chemists note these form ordered structures Thus a Face centered cubic arrangement has a different density than a body centered cubic arrangement
If we ignore that arranging to just look at amorphous density then we find some elements have
equal densities Zn as well as Cr have density 7.14
thus whatever the actual preferred crystal form of a Zn or Cr crystal is if we put just one Zn or Cr atom at the tip or side of an ordered crystal made of the different element then all of the reacting that atom does will be from Nucleus charge rather than actual atomic radius difference
It appears that this gives an AFM tip the ability to view things with higher resolution than an AFM tip of just one element or of a crystallized compound
From a nanotechnological point of view with an amorphous equidistant mass the density is reminiscent of which atoms have an average similar radius yet the actual electronegativity of the atom as well as that atoms quantum conduction areas is what will react to the thing being characterized
rather than a bunch of atoms flexing to modify measured e- its just one atom flexing as the tip nears an object
Now there is a peculiar thing about this: I got my density numbers from wolframalpha so its possible they used a copy of the CRC handbook numbers for say a chunk of Cr with FCC crystals at STP as well as a chunk of Zn with BCC crystals at STP or its possible they calculated amorphous density from AMU times atomic radius
note that atomic radius varies irregularly with atomic mass thus Gallium might actually be more dense than Germanium even though Germanium has more protons plus neutrons; generally if its a liquid near STP like Ga or Br it has a tighter nucleus
My idea works if they did AMU times atomic radius
yet they have the densities of things like nitrogen as .0001 with Zn at 7.14 thus I think the densities are a chunk of element at STP
I still think the idea works its just I don't know which elements actually have identical amorphus density from AMU times atomic radius
wolframalpha lists elements on density
http://www61.wolfra...?i=elements+density [beanangel, Jun 06 2009]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., http://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
Whoa, hold it right there, Beany. Which edition of CRC are
you using? You know about the restandardization issue, yes?
And have allowed for that? |
|
| |
Also, in case you hadn't considered it, you'll be reminded of
the shell factor in relation to small numbers of atoms which
don't follow Cole's Law. |
|
| |
The point is, all this was done back in the 60's (theoretically)
and the 80's (for real). But you knew that, didn't you? |
|
| |
Another possibility to create a higher resolution AFM tip I wonder if anyone has made an AFM yet where a laser tuned to the band gap of the tip atom(s) enegizes the tip a few billion times per s then the tip phosphoresces of fluoresces These quantum effects might vary with nearness to another atom as compounds have varying phospherescence as well as fluorescence |
|
| |
I feel like that is saying adjustable quantum dot as AFM tip |
|
| |
compounds are different than afm tip near an atom yet they detect atoms with overlapping orbitals that is to say spatial variations on e- |
|
| |
If you want something smaller than regular atoms, use one of those shrunken blacklight atoms. |
|
| |
// the tip phosphoresces of fluoresces// You lost me and all
people of sound mind at that point. I'm voting [-] because it
pisses me off when you don't take the trouble to be
coherent - it's just intellectual masturbation unless you
make the effort to share it with other people. |
|
| |
// then the tip phosphoresces [or] fluoresces // This part sounds original...but I'm uninformed; one more thing to Google sometime |
|
| |
[] due to lack of full stops and excessive intellectual turbidity |
|
| |
This won't work at all, as it will cause the sub-etha
nullification of any ordered structure to which it applies.
Besides, the flexure coefficient will cause unintended wave
crossover deformities in the field. It will also break the
kinibbling pin, get your daughter pregnant, and give your dog
mange. |
|
| |