 h a l f b a k e r y Yeah, I wish it made more sense too.
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
Login
Create account.
|
|
| Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
| |
I can think of two issues: |
|
| |
The amount of energy required to seperate the hydrogen and oxygen would be pretty large, factoring in inefficiency, you'd probably have high electrical consumption. Also, any inpurities or mineral content in the water would end up on the electrodes, resulting in crusty electrodes. |
|
| |
a hydrogen cell cooker, now there's one way to stop global warming! Yum! |
|
| |
Um, [benlevi7], only if that electricity is produced through 'green' ways. |
|
| |
Mabe, it'd be better if you used heating filimates? |
|
| |
<Lifts leg, sprays> ouch!</lifts bandaged leg & hops away> |
|
| |
Had another thought:
This technology could also be used to make a fireplace that runs on water and electricity.
Something would have to be added to make the flame visible. Perhaps a fine screen that glows when heated
.
The cool thing about this fireplace is that no exhaust would be required. In winter it would act as a humidifier and a heater! |
|
| |
inefficiently delicious. + |
|
| |
Bah. Nothing is quite the same as a real charcoal barbeque... but I have had some pretty good steaks off of a propane barbeque, and I don't see why you could use hydrogen gas instead. One flame-broiled bun coming right up. |
|
| |
I've thought about having a hydrogen/oxygen lamp with
the fuel being pure water. But a BBQ steak is better
then a dinky light...+ |
|
| |