h a l f b a k e r y
Why on earth would you want that many gazelles anyway?

meta:

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

 user: pass:
register,

# Energy-Saving Raised Intersection Approach Lanes

Raise the level of the road at intersections to form a kinetic-potential energy storage-recovery system
 (+3) [vote for, against]

Everyone enjoys roads, they provide valuable play areas for the world's children and put 10m of Asphalt between the idiots at No. 24 and me. However, when people are driving about on roads, they sometimes feel the need to be on a different, often perpendicular, road. This has forced the ugly compromise that is the intersection, with cars stopping and starting all over the place in a mesmeric orgy of wasted kinetic energy.

Now, should the road slowly rise on approach to the intersection... cars would be forced to trade kinetic energy for potential energy. The structure in question would be on the entry-to-the-intersection side of the road and similar to a long gentle speed bump, maximum height about 10cm. So, if the cars were slowing to a stop, then a portion of the kinetic energy would be converted to potential energy. Assuming the car is to resume movement, this potential energy will be regained as the car descends the small downhill section. If the car passes through the intersection without stopping, then the kinetic energy will be lost and regained pretty seamlessly.

Some considerations: the rise and fall cannot be too sudden... otherwise the benefit will be lost, heating the car's suspension.

Side benefit: when stationary at the intersection, you will be 10cm higher than normal. This is a useful aid to visibility.

Numbers: The kinetic energy of a 2000kg car at about 5mph is about 5kJ.

Raising that same car 10cm uses about 2/5ths of that. Meaning that about 2kJ is saved per car per (stopping)intersection.

There's about 1.3x10*8 J in a gallon of petrol. which is probably used at about 25% efficiency. Which means 1 gallon is saved for every 16250 car-junctions. Of course it won't work for more than say... the first 2-3 cars in a queue. So don't get all carried away with thoughts of energy independence.

 — bs0u0155, Nov 23 2012

elevated stop lights — WhiteWiz, Mar 26 2004 plus an illustration by [bris]. Doesn't get more halfbaked than that! [pocmloc, Nov 23 2012]

for highways. [FlyingToaster, Nov 23 2012]

William Heath Robinson http://en.wikipedia...wiki/Heath_Robinson
Inspired. Definite Halfbakery material. [8th of 7, Nov 23 2012]

If you're not logged in, you can see what this page looks like, but you will not be able to add anything.
Short name, e.g., Bob's Coffee
Destination URL. E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)

I'll bun it, but good luck getting the motoring public to understand how it works. They already have enough trouble with things like turn indicators, stop signs, and the definition of 'yield'.
 — Alterother, Nov 23 2012

There are some raised intersections where I live and they have about one wreck a day because one person is turning left on green without being able to see down the hill, meanwhile the car coming the other way decides to add kinetic energy with their V8 instead of trading it for potential and slams into the other car at 50mph.
 — DIYMatt, Nov 23 2012

Your text is nicer but you can't argue with prior art. <link>
 — pocmloc, Nov 23 2012

OK, so I should clarify: the whole intersection is not raised. Only one lane on the approach... so the Left in UK/India/Japan/Australia or the Right in Djibouti/Gabon/Vanuatu. Also, there is no angle. The raised section has a flat top, the gradient will be a couple of car lengths back. There's a couple of reasons for this: 1. doing a hill start is a pain. 2. the angle will ruin visibility and also, headlights will be pointing all over the place.
 — bs0u0155, Nov 23 2012

 William Heath Robinson might have been a worthy competitor ...