h a l f b a k e r yKeep out of reach of children.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
| |
I wish my nick name was "no-one" :-P ... I'd prove your point |
|
| |
//I'd think it interesting if the background of the page got ever dirtier looking the more times the page is read. Conversely, if the page gets few views, cobwebs appear.// |
|
| |
That would surely be possible, with some creative Java scripting? |
|
| |
It's a shame people had to annotate on this. It was nice and ironic before. |
|
| |
Yes, I remember voting on it, but not annotating. |
|
| |
That's true, [bris], server logs would be the way to go. As for view counts... I'd go for gross views, as it is a better indicator of actual use, like the number of people who use a train in a year. |
|
| |
The problem would be the tendency of people to ring up as many views as possible, to see how much they can dirty up an idea. |
|
| |