 h a l f b a k e r y Why did I think of that?
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
Login
Create account.
|
|
| Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
| |
- Most of my outlets aren't visible; they're behind desks or shelves. |
|
| |
- They're also often not easy to reach - not a good place for a user interface in general. |
|
| |
- If they were visible and easy to reach, having little blinkenlights on them would drive me completely utterly nuts. |
|
| |
- If they're off most of the time, you're distributing a lot of test electronics that would better stay where they are right now, in a tester. |
|
| |
- If I remember correctly, circuits trip, not individual outlets (they may trip with a ground fault, but that's something different.) |
|
| |
Nevertheless, I'd enjoy a tasteful analog display for the total of my kitchen circuits. Things are switched on and off there a lot, and it would be fun to see the changes. |
|
| |
A clamp type ammeter hooked up to a l.e.d bargraph display. |
|
| |
And as the cost of the outlet approaches $50, you may as well add a nightlight, telephone jack, RJ45 jack and X-10 capability and call it a night. |
|
| |
If you're so close to overloading your circuits to benefit from having these, you're better off to get some electrical work done and increase your capacity. |
|
| |
And while we're at it, "feasible". |
|
| |
How about providing the same type of information from each outlet via an embedded web server. Then you could monitor any outlet from a web browser without the requirement that the outlet be physically accessible. With this system, software could monitor and log the activity on each outlet and even remotely power the devices on and off. Great for those individuals to whom the term "too much information" has no meaning. |
|
| |
Re: "ground fualt circuit interuptor" [sic]. Given the sensitivity and speed with which a GFCI necessarily functions, there's not much chance that you'd see the warning before the event. |
|
| |
Since it seems that many electrical fires are started by overloaded lightweight extension cords or "multiplexer" devices, maybe an integrated smoke detector would be a nice touch. |
|
| |
the LEDs wouldnt have to be on 24/7 only come on breifly when they change ampage and stay on if in the red...
also i think 15 LEDs is unessary, this could be accomplished with 3-4: 1-2 green 1 yellow 1red |
|
| |