h a l f b a k e r y
Not from concentrate.
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
Login
Create account.
|
|
| Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
| |
Why is this a non-invention (category). It's just as much as an invention as many other ideas here. However, if you don't remove the first eight words you may find yourself in some deep water (pun intended) with zealous 'bakers. |
|
| |
Aside from that, I expect that some kind of pressure problem would cause the viewers' heads to explode, or something similar, but never mind. |
|
| |
I happened to catch an airing of the movie "Domino" over the weekend wherein one of the Mafia crimelords (Stanley Kamel as Anthony Cigliutti) utilized an underwater clear acrylic bubble in his home pool in which to conduct all of his sensitive phone conversations. By using a waterproof cordless phone inside this bubble he was apparently able to thwart all the electronic eavesdropping equipment that the FBI had trained on him. While the purpose of [npinn]'s bubble is obviously different, the end product sounds very similar. |
|
| |
Well yes, it's a diving bell built into a
swimming pool. I like the idea. I can't see
it catching on due to safety concerns but
that doesn't stop me liking it. [+] |
|
| |
I don't forsee a lot of risks involved in using this idea. Most home pools are less than 8 feet deep, and unless the users are in a drysuit, their entire body will probably get all wrinkly before they get enough nitrogen compressed into their veins to cause the bends when they come up. Perhaps some real divers can examine the problem, and compute a solution to determine what the risk is. |
|
| |
No risk of decompression sickness. [st3f] is likely thinking of other safety concerns, such as an accidental face-plant on the not-so-visible bell, someone drowning unnoticed because they're not necessarily expected to surface, et cetera, or at least those would be my concerns. But what better place for a lifeguard than inside the bubble? |
|
| |
For safety concerns, I dont think parents or lifeguards would like the idea of swimmers routinely going under and not coming up, regardless of how they were staying under. [-] |
|
| |
I wouldn't have thought you'd be risking
any problems with dissolved nitrogen
surfacing from a couple of metres. I
would, as a caution, avoid flying,
climbing a mountain or other low
pressure activities for a day afterwards,
though. |
|
| |
I'd be concerned about the breathability
of the air. Since you've got a small
quantity of air that is being 'topped up'
rather than changed, you may get a
build up of toxic gases as well as
lowered oxygen. I'd recommend
purging the bubble freqently and
refilling it from empty. |
|
| |
Lastly there's the diving ontop of
it/swimming into it and lifeguard
issues. If this were a private pool, I'm
sure that these could be addressed by
good pool design and buddying up as
per diving -- you only use the bubble
when you're swimming with someone
else who watches you (and you watch
them). That way if you hit your head
they can drag you out/raise the alarm. |
|
| |
For the curious I've linked a (conservative) dive table. It lists all depths up to 20' (6.1m) as unlimited, meaning no decompression required regardless of how long you stay at that depth. It is common practice when sport diving to ascend slowly to 15' and stay there for 5 minutes before surfacing, as a safety precaution, in case you pushed the limits a bit while you were deep. In fact, the longer you stay at 15' the better (on the way up). For practical purposes, you are decompressed if you never went below 20'. |
|
| |
[marked-for-deletion] widely known to exist. Even Alexander the Great had one. |
|
| |
I disagree with the mfd - this is for a permanent fixture in a pool, perhaps for social use; not for the predecessors of the (single person, portable) diving bell. |
|
| |
This would be a safety nightmare for a public pool, plus you would probably get all the pervos in it watching patrons tread water. |
|
| |
I don't think it would be all that helpful for a lifeguard due to its lack of mobility. Leisure pools frequently have a lot of nooks and curves in them, and this device would not allow you to see around walls, nor would it be much help in a crowded environment. In addition, outdoor pools have cloudy water due to sunscreen. |
|
| |