 h a l f b a k e r y The mutter of invention.
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
or Create a new account.
|
|
| Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
| |
Yes, i like. If the screen was also light-sensitive, it could be a scanner, display, fax and printer all in one. |
|
| |
Without an intervening lens, wouldn't this still produce a reversed mirror image on the photosensitive sheet? |
|
| |
If the sheets were transparent, the 'back' could then become the 'front', solving the problem of reversal. Or are we getting into the realms of magic? |
|
| |
jurist brings up a good and embarrassing point. In addition to this, the thick glass on CRT's could produce a blurry printout. I suggest we add: |
|
| |
- a backing that can be peeled off on the side away from the screen, so that we have a film (as jtp suggested). |
|
| |
- a layer on the display side that consists of tubes that restricts non-perpendicular incoming light. This layer can also be peeled off and when it is peeled off, an adhesive layer is uncovered. The film can then be stuck onto a piece of paper. |
|
| |
It's very regrettable that the product now becomes more complicated. I might hold a grudge against jurist. |
|
| |
How do these tubes restrict non-perpendicular light? Oh, wait, they could be black. |
|
| |
Correct, their walls could be black. |
|
| |
Why talk about CRTs? There are other display devices. I think there would be a problem with pixellation though. What appears OK on a display might look awful on a piece of paper. The resolution of a screen image can be a lot lower than one intended for a physical photograph before it starts to look ropey. |
|
| |
You're right displays have much lower resolutions then printers. I like the idea of being able to get a screen print anywhere you go, from any screen, even an ATM.This would be so handy that the shortcomings would be acceptable. |
|
| |
If you assume you have control over the computer system, you could stay with the simple system and just mirror the screen while you make your print. |
|
| |
And one could make time-lapse images (night sky pics) with sufficiently slow-moving video. Could make a much easier way to get that type of image. |
|
| |
The low resolution would be more noticeable up close, but would be less of an issue on an LCD screen particularly if its of the "glossy" variety (ie Macbook). |
|
| |