h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
[+]... you could hire a midget robot to climb over the plane changing the CG. |
|
|
// adjust the center of gravity by pumping fuel or something // |
|
|
....or maybe praying..... check out you have a good religion before takeoff...... |
|
|
What is the advantage? No tail? What is the advantage over a delta wing? |
|
|
The advantages are no tail, and no separate pitch-control surfaces/inputs. Probably a better speed range than a delta wing. |
|
|
It uses the VG mechanism for an additional function, at the cost of having to mess with the CG to be able use the wing-sweep for speed flight. It's probably pointless, but it's possible, I think. |
|
|
You could build a compact airplane this way, with no tail and folding wings, maybe. |
|
|
I assume this is dynamically stabilised like a Segway. It's possible to build a static, stable, tailless aeroplane by using long, highly swept wings, but part of the wing in such designs provides downforce, which I assume you want to avoid. This could have a better lift to drag ratio than conventional designs, since the problems of the relatively non-lifting tailplane (or canard) are avoided. |
|
|
Northrop and Mitchell have built aircraft without tails, but they still have control surfaces (very busy ailerons). |
|
|
The 'flying wing' or "tailless' design has one persistant shortcoming - yaw control. One answer is to put a substantial dihedral into the design to give some measure of lateral control. But without a stabilising fin, landing in even a slight crosswind is a nightmare, since if the only way to turn is to drop a wing - when you're doing your best to keep the wings level - it can be a tad stressful.
It's possible to yaw by advancing and retarding the throttles, but again, on landing, it's a bit awkward - and on a jet, there's an appreciable lag between throttle movement and thrust response, if an increase in power is called for. |
|
|
The Vulcan bomber is a nice delta design - almost a flying wing - but of course with a fin at the back. |
|
|
Yaws, indeed. I was thinking about putting a swiveling fin in front, atop the fuselage (what there is of a fuselage) under very rapid computer control. |
|
|
The B2 "gets away with it" because of size and inertia and (being a military aircraft) its rather luxurious power-to-weight ratio. [baconbrain] specifies "small" .... big aircraft have a measure of stability simply by the larger moments required to change attitude. |
|
|
They tried to lose the tail fins on the F-117, but they couldn't -too small, too easy to flip over. |
|
|
A wing, variable or static, is considered a control surface isn't it? |
|
|
No. To qualify as a "control surface" it has to move relative to the airframe, under command. |
|
|
//The Vulcan bomber is a nice delta design// - understatement & amen |
|
| |