h a l f b a k e r y
Experiencing technical difficulties since 1999
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
or get an account
I'm starting to look for a new mobile phone to replace my excellent (but heavy and 5 year old) Nokia 3210. I've found that mobile phone shops don't have all the phones I'm interested in (i.e. can afford) and won't let me try out several working models side-by-side.
I would like a slim, light phone
with a simple, usable interface. I can get the feel of a phone from the 'dummy' phones they have in the phone shops, but for the interface, I would like a website with pictures of the phones on which the buttons and screens actually worked. You'd click around the phone's interface with your mouse (e.g. sending dummy text messages) and be able to tell, for example that your chosen phone has decent predictive texting but requires a completely unnecessary 6 key presses to end the message and choose a recipient, and also that the menu font is vile and unchangeable.
(?) My new mobile is lumbered with a bewildering array of unnecessary features aimed at idiots
by Charlie Brooker. Sums up mobile phones quite nicely. [calum, May 14 2007]
(?) Nokia's free remote device access
Log onto a phone somewhere and interact with it [DenholmRicshaw, May 15 2007]
(?) Linux Phone - OpenMoko
Article about the upcoming Open Software cell phone powered by Linux with a user-customizable interface [marc1919, May 16 2007]
don't make tv like this these days, thank god [not_morrison_rm, Jul 14 2015]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
||My partner is visually impaired and trying to find a phone she can use is really hard without an operating phone. An internet version of the phone OS and display would be so useful.
||Very good idea. I foresee IP issues with the replication of interfaces, though, unless the manufacturers can be persuaded to license them. Which Samsung for one surely won't want to do, given that their interfaces are consistently dogsdinneresque.
||It's a good idea for the most part but the only problem is that the online version of the interface would have a shed load more processor power behind it. One of the main things that ticks me off about my phone is how slowly it takes to get from one screen to the next or think about the key you just pressed.
||There could be a dealy built into the online version to accurately mimic the phone version. It would have to fairly accurately reflect the reality of the phone or it may fall foul of UK advertising law if it was used by a retailer to promote their wares.
||If that'd work, and it was enforcable by advertising standards agencies, then you get a [+]
||You can download the firmware and file system firmware from most phones. From there you just have to emulate the hardware.
||One thing I like about Sony Ericsson phones is menu continuity form phone to phone.
||There are numerous emulators out there. Not sure if they go as far as you'd like.
||So in 2007 we didn't have android?
||My kids were talking last week about the time when I,
their father, was a kid. They explained: In his time they
didn't invent color pictures yet.
||I don't think so - I think this idea comes from an era
when the world was still ruled by Nokia, Ericsson and
||One problem Im facing with my Xperia Z which I still
have from several years ago when it was new, and
which still works perfectly from the hardware point
of view, is that it is no longer the phone I bought.
The current android on there is baffling, obtuse, has
many features utterly missing (no feature to create a
new email; no feature to create a new contact; had
totally lost my wifes contact details; repeatedly
totally losing the newly entered information of my
wifes contact; no ability to make new google docs;
no way of adding a new alarm; lots of other utterly
moronic feature destruction). When I
bought the phone in 2013, I was quite enjoying
with the same phone, theres no way Id elect to buy
a phone like this. So the virtual phone service would
also have to project the future life cycle of each
phone to predict how obtuse it will become, and
||//There are numerous emulators out there.
||I'm in favour of them, especially the Rod Hull version
||Oh, and I discovered today that theres no silent
mode any more. You have to turn the whole phone
||//An upgrade to Android can well upset an old
||Surely the whole point of software development is to
ensure turnover in the hardware market? Modern
electronics will often last for years, if not decades,
so the only way to disable them is through software.
||Its got nothing to do with the age of the hardware.
My Xperia Z is just as fast, lasts just as long on
batteries, sounds just as good, takes just as good
pictures, and is probably slightly less waterproof as it
was when I got it. Its just that idiot fucking google
have basically fucked up Android beyond belief. The
new Android 5 is unusable. Loads of basic things just
missing, no way make new actions or things,
constantly barraging me with a gate of slabs of little
alerts of things Ive never heard of and no idea of,
and you can't get rid of this. I was trying to make a
phone call the other day and the barrage of slab of
notices came up, preventing me from hanging up the
call, so I had to hold the power button down to shut
the phone down. Its not a question of the phone
being a few years old, a mid-2015 phone wouldnt be
significantly different in capabilities, speed or power.
Its the operating system. Its fucked. I cant use it.
||Likewise, my Nexus S phone - it doesn't accept Android updates beyond 4.1.2 but every update up until then seemed to slow the phone down a little...