h a l f b a k e r y
Not just a think tank. An entire army of think.
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
Login
Create account.
|
|
|
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
XenoCart
Great for math and philosophy classes | |
A recent annotation remarked regarding the impracticality of Xeno's paradox, considering the inability of humans to perform the tiniest of motions that would soon be required in the application of this motion algorithm.
Oddly, this annotation was written by [half], but we won't dwell on that.
However,
it occurst to me that one can easily construct a moveable contraption, the XenoCart, that can accept computerized commands to move a wide range of distances. Perhaps using the technology IBM used to spell it's name in atoms, it could get into quite fine fractions.
The cart, perhaps resting on a length of rail, would be designed to turn a light on or ring a buzzer in the event that it actually reached a destination.
Bystanders would then look in amazement as the cart moves half distances but never quite reaches its goal.
Xeno's Paradox
http://www.jimloy.com/physics/zeno.htm
Not really a paradox, but if you use a fixed time step you may be able to trick people into thinking it is. [Worldgineer, Jan 26 2005]
Annotation:
|
| |
Sorry, there's some math and philosophy I find interesting, but these reenactments -- I think this is the third in two weeks -- of the same centuries-old category error bore me to smaller, and smaller, and smaller, pieces. |
|
| |
That's a good one, Jutta. Or is it a good half? A good quarter?... |
|
| |
If it were broken, how could you ever find out? |
|
| |
zeno, who's side are you on here? |
|
| |
Well, uhm, you know, uhm, uhm, like, uhm, if, uhm you know, uhm, |
|
| |