 h a l f b a k e r y What was the question again?
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
Login
Create account.
|
|
| Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
| |
Ice is not strong enough. Your beam will need rebar. |
|
| |
Also, ice is not flexiable, stretcy, or a high tensile strengh material. So - no ice nets. |
|
| |
Whats the physics with the strength of ice? Seems pretty hard to me... My feet are cold though. |
|
| |
Hardness and "strength" are not directly related. Specifically, there are four aspects of what is commonly viewed as "strength", though there is no actual definition of "strength" in a material. Anyway, two aspects are hardness and toughness. Hardness is a measure of how much a material resists deforming. Toughness is a measure of it's resistance to "snapping" (materials with very low toughness tend to shatter like glass, while high toughness materials bend and stretch under force). These two are usually inversely proportional, more or less--the harder a material is, the less tough, and vice versa. |
|
| |
You've also got tensile vs. compressive strength--how much a material resists being pushed and pulled. If you pull on a rope, that's tensile strength, and if you squeeze a brick, that's compressive strength. |
|
| |
Ice has reasonable hardness--nowhere near most metals, but enough that people think of it as "hard". It also has good compressive strength. However, neither of those matter in this application--Ice has terrible toughness and tensile strength, which would be the primary concerns in this application, and because of that this structure will never support its own weight. It'll snap in half unless supported by another material. |
|
| |
And, of course, Ice exhibits NONE of the properties that are desireable in a net. |
|
| |
There are lots of other properties of materials that could factor into "strength", I've just listed the four biggest and most common ones. |
|
| |
[Po], that table is for ice on water. The water underneath supports the ice. |
|
| |
How about a simulation using HTPE
coating on the cable and slippers? |
|
| |
I know [5th] but it seemed appropriate. how thick would this ice need to be for what length? its a shame this won't work at all because the slipperiness factor seemed interesting to me as well as the coldness to the feet. oh well, back to the drawing board... |
|
| |
After it got thick enough, it probably wouldn't support its own weight. |
|
| |
Oh, it could work Po, just not with pure ice. As mentioned, if you put some rebar in it or something, it probably could work. I'm currently actually neutral on this one. |
|
| |
oh didn't I mention, there was an electrical current running through it :) |
|
| |
if it were flavoured (make mine raspberry) it would not be pure... |
|
| |
could we use stalactites? |
|
| |