h a l f b a k e r yExpensive, difficult, slightly dangerous, not particularly effective... I'm on a roll.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
i suppose the reason I haven't seen this idea baked is that the tobacco and toothpaste companies have too many shareholders in common.
Smoke-No-More
http://www.smoke-no....co.uk/roadshow.htm
Advertises mouthwash not paste [rayfo, Jul 03 2001]
[link]
|
| |
He means a toothpaste that makes tobacco taste bad. (See "#3 frightens" in the "MultiTubes" idea.) |
|
| |
Is this actually doable, or just a case of "use unspecified technology to accomplish arbitrary magic"? |
|
| |
I know of but can't track down that there several common/harmless? [metallic salts?] which make tobacco smoke taste horrible - until we wash our mouth with water ... presumably. |
|
| |
Putting a harmless reactive substance [undetectably] in toothpaste [which we have a habit of using], would sustain to a certain extent more than in mouthwash, our willpower to stop smoking. |
|
| |
However see original posting. |
|
| |
[First time I've done a link. Hence the hash-up.] |
|
| |