h a l f b a k e r y
Alas, poor spelling!

meta:

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

 user: pass:
register,

# Bricks of Pi

your house to 42,000 decimal places
 (+7, -3) [vote for, against]

When Bricks of Pi are being manufactured, each block receives a four digit number stamped onto its outside face, prior to firing.

These numerals are extracted out of the infinite series that results from the evaluation of Pi. You can lay them in any order, or request a precise sequence corresponding to the number of bricks required to construct your entire building.

Also available - The House That Genome Built.

 — xenzag, Jul 20 2008

pi to 50,000 decimal places http://www.geocitie.../1216/numtab/pi.htm
or is it an outside wall of that new science tower? [xenzag, Jul 20 2008]

Normal Numbers http://en.wikipedia.../wiki/Normal_number
In mathematics, a normal number is, roughly speaking, a real number whose digits (in every base) show a uniform distribution... [futurebird, Jul 21 2008]

every conceivable sequence.... http://www.inwit.co...ndodditiesofpi.html
occurs in pi [xenzag, Jul 21 2008]

Search pi for strings http://www.angio.net/pi/bigpi.cgi
My SS number doesn't occur in the first 200 million digits, but a string of the first 8 digits does, and also the strings 00000000, 11111111, 22222222, 121212121, and 12345678. [ldischler, Jul 21 2008]

The Pi Code http://users.aol.com/s6sj7gt/picode.htm
[ldischler, Jul 21 2008]

Today is Pi approximation day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi_Day
[DenholmRicshaw, Jul 22 2008]

[hippo, May 10 2017]

http://www.bbc.co.u...technology-11313194 Pi record smashed as team finds two-quadrillionth digit [xenzag, May 12 2017]

Pi in the sky http://www.angio.net/pi/piquery
Dave Andersen's program allows you to enter up to a 120-digit pattern for which it will search through the first (now updated to) 200,000,000 decimal places of Pi. It also shows you many of the digits which surround the location of a pattern match (very helpful!); however, in order to find multiple occurrences of the same pattern it's necessary to click on a "Find Next" link for each one. As an example, here's the output you'd get searching for the pattern 99999999 (eight nines): [xenzag, May 12 2017]

It's a bit of a slog, but well worth it - 3Blue1Brown is a truly gifted mathematics communicator. [+] [zen_tom, May 27 2017]

three point one four one five nine two six five three five eight nine seven nine three two three eight four six two six four three three eight three two seven n ine five zero two eight eight four one nine seven one six nine three nine nine t hree seven five one zero five eight two zero nine seven four nine four four five nine two three zero seven eight one six four zero six two eight six two zero ei ght nine nine eight six two eight zero three four eight two five three four two one one seven zero six seven nine eight two one four eight zero eight six five o ne three two eight two three zero six six four seven zero nine three eight four four six zero nine five five zero five eight two two three one seven two five th ree five nine four zero eight one two eight four eight one one one seven four fi ve zero two eight four one zero two seven zero one nine three eight five two one one zero five five five nine six four four six two two nine four eight nine fiv e four nine three zero three eight one nine six four four two eight eight one ze ro nine seven five six six five nine three three four four six one two eight fou r seven five six four eight two three three seven eight six seven eight three on e six five two seven one two zero one nine zero nine one four five six four eigh t five six six nine two three four six zero three four eight six one zero four f ive four three two six six four eight two one three three nine three six zero se ven two six zero two four nine one four one two seven three seven two four five eight seven zero zero six six zero six three one five five eight eight one seven four eight eight one five two zero nine two zero nine six two eight two nine tw o five four zero nine one seven one five three six four three six seven eight ni ne two five nine zero three six zero zero one one three three zero five three ze ro five four eight eight two zero four six six five two one three eight four one four six nine five one nine four one five one one six zero nine four three thre e zero five seven two seven zero three six five seven five nine five nine one ni ne five three zero nine two one eight six one one seven three eight one nine thr ee two six one one seven nine three one zero five one one eight five four eight zero seven four four six two three seven nine nine six two seven four nine five six seven three five one eight eight five seven five two seven two four eight ni ne one two two seven nine three eight one eight three zero one one nine four nin e one two nine eight three three six seven three three six two four four zero si x five six six four three zero eight six zero two one three nine four nine four six three nine five two two four seven three seven one nine zero seven zero two one seven nine eight six zero nine four three seven zero two seven seven zero fi ve three nine two one seven one seven six two nine three one seven six seven fiv e two three eight four six seven four eight one eight four six seven six six nin e four zero five one three two zero zero zero five six eight one two seven one f our five two six three five six zero eight two seven seven eight five seven seve n one three four two seven five seven seven eight nine six zero nine one seven t https://libraryofba...gi?rbuxycdrep_p.253
The book you were reading was Volume 3 on Shelf 2 of Wall 4 of Hexagon 345ykm0dqb0v8cnoexvgvuanfoxnu6j15ril5a4hry2g269u1i2ifiee zm2hxgsx6881d1gva59gdl8fz7tokzr5cvsarvs7ulqxj5pvuoz7rdps 7rijfspap8ltgax2jaa87imq8sr26szbz1upblp1e3vs4shrz0gglilw gt1h86o4a9r3xvp5ctmk70xtmo75bf4rcw42hwlcluts7rei2vmrbmsd 8buz5pb1uh2syfvhq9z2ywzybh0ui2yjwpi97hpzc9evkff8op9rm17p 7fuuqhibyi55r0bxo9rvpy0x4jstvtzjdayq94fj1c9o2u3ewmgtmp6g zq1s3rg60m46p3jzv0xgc2amf16d8s9m1ev35cwkixzch9h4pddcar38 l05z78dtir2cm7xo67bqtydl4dxilc1bk9ajzvb8m9jwezs9x4gs7y7r ctbcg1sj1aqckrk8dqnyjmhu7f82vu6vicr4ebnnxf4c0zx356yntogl vxuqqwk93cnkxabu18a7vkmkbkmdpav0kp9my0m1jqggsp83y7htbga6 hulzm0l2d5hupf3bej556sgk5blgzjli7f7k0wlnxtey55ssseki51fz ljcow7axlnuezswn9czp0f6546xs9u265duxcyafzdaqenjkcst14dmc z5w1xz11lcgbn25e5oaejp7onmbsif6gutdfwqc9v9yr3rduys6jpdyg ctgyp10u4kg9phnkudkyp8jl1xqs5skxy852y4syckpykluao0du0uj7 xbsjzecmydvpvq21x1fn07lndfzvskyxh44ewy3vd56eqi1g6cbwdwwg qsrzuvr75vmb2lir8ia65foxov8dvubmiss5at5ta4k8p23054qgt2a8 3wds37g90irjn5rh7q5rc9vzauu0fds61zfq1etzp2pn8ix6uir597i3 h86xewh44m5bk6o4p0dyl48e697cittd13jlzzc8fhffayixtu3ly88h xbcl712c3urcm3m0ivrb5htdji7ygbbll478cidalrsqokj6gz7xaxgz 3sinurodmf7q2n9y84aoiz8q9aq05j205unafwqx1ys3c40t2pn14f1p 78uj0egusi2dpbxgpybh2cj7k9sakpnaocnk2hbz2m4qgser3whyhrw9 21yje3an55lfzbu5yey9r5ob3dc0a18zzencfbz5vml7p43osp38xzpw ehuo3s5nw98re5g6e4cdr3z8z69m9uik10mvgmolp78x6hlokuswerx3 5egpphx2bbx710q8qjdwcnqcu9y2pmk7d9570hi8452y3ze047m47108 nzd6vpirx1xi4tkpid6wk7xa9kxw8w26br2k21y80k3uw4j8b929gugb jff5orfl3yt1pyx1hmwjk4574yw47j1au9uhy16cpp52v48n40bsf4kd 86x4u8zx74qtelf6rcayr3obicsvfpu4j9u6garxjcw12398cdros2vf 2rzwxt30xy8zkh8tn0k96k3m40juj05axjxnx6dqvp25zdm27787pov3 diny00mtrtndyro5jdybe2rkc3eovqcvk7igb4qal93rzgppb4geair8 shxifsk1xjws9aszb18pztdh5ifkt67m3daln2r3hmoacwellrjjogsm 2x22iw3iwylt83qvqxgfo4vbpcjwtuovi4ugvjw48w2e1w73ywaunq41 i4xux87d7epa2myme2b70i2nu6h4h2jl6wglqy7l0g365mxlnj05n97t w1niuh30777f48ms9mjfswpdrhnzv67y7u42j2v43mbnan02jtaez5sf 5e3bjwqz4tbs7a7hcsub5lt6ox0wfmlumm4k5hwbs6uc7yhfmxb9n1ju 353bakhyh1292zetn0yadwk3wrhdgse89su91zmbm5tqk66aqyqo2afg ckp09a45ktqrj2jcfb5jm5d3r2kvos293t6xfrsxy6t4bckornxmhdgi usq1kstfnojr8bpqi81rv1c41r7ru1uz0j4tcpjnv88gbv79bezo8cxz u7pqwqq3337kffucljvyue35eqxjlz59gy3y9mwgulf8fj5joew8i7p8 fln2drt14jt5oslarmwkobm9auv4h2m7j92acvbo9kmw9c51w80pb5df o3xcr3at0imn26gq6f7bwrpozhwfnqyt111svmbyez30ziaw82ahlalr lrlwjm62o5l2220cccrwmghyjgrbmf2fcue5umtaaxr325rhkpyzn8gb o5h77q5j7tm9gk159x96fkirbp6l3ju27clfpa0sp71y8fy18y6wvtpy ohmqrp2vwado7rbptjca6sak4icomx40e7ny72jpw0he2lmtslxgcvfh wmlzkgo0f4dud60qp3qynuo3x1ecqujwgktrgrlvxy89x1evlhn5493m 6s6j6lwzletvwhn4afzk5f431qu30ndgjedwcrnhpz2wxqjzzec3pe0g nuf8c0nz6auc949sdi7cg6cuxeecumxmef8jfjub8o6x6royui790c53 qzkfdt47bb5utphwnyszobicjol584jxxgmy20yyngw1nc0lgcs90o0a aa4g2h5wsa3zw2cj6tuajqunudpxi1c5a9im8g7j3s3yrt4o1l4ti2j5 tytx0h3fm2yoke4nucn9kj2bu7mku2q5fg9sti2ts3eur53oyebqnoao lz3s88igedvw4r8i1gjbz5lzckp70ki9ushlwkcl8d10m28dta6ubo6a tqv4j4dmnw4deej1gf7qu8waml8xhu5ug51tjxh1dbp894bjjhkpaaey zo0rr5o9lrie4n4zreqctbeykhrl2ys8seyk4fz185vt8eio09wuy5qq ny33goarpck5qyjmgcw8dwig02bw9h0xlbdh3tu8axud0ar7t131kvfb ufsapsnrmpnqgouks034knxaqsls83vle084asuyl61mqxv9eje65h9f 7r0mrn0799h9k6rrm3x84v8p12wsrrgc1cn4ca4rys3iucxl961evuwp l2q0tbuatsk4o3hlbkwi2frilqtklu2qk0eli90xsd916w1lyxc9l3h9 ndeelokk82yijwi5ank5hmnik7svdpmpza373dqjy74zrbd8hwbe0ofc 8t4uiztpsw5dhrumoh1k8hmjh49332k9ee9uzuuw44bvw01yo07tykq0 g2t227 [pocmloc, May 27 2017]

//You can lay them in any order//
Of course you can, and it's still a sequence of pi.
 — ldischler, Jul 20 2008

Is it? How so?
 — jutta, Jul 20 2008

it has been proven that any arbitrary sequence of numbers appears somewhere in the sequence of pi.
 — sninctown, Jul 20 2008

 It has? Where?

(I realize that this is widely believed, but I find it difficult to prove - it's a different statement from "there are infinitely many digits in the decimal expansion of pi" or from "pi is non-repeating".)
 — jutta, Jul 20 2008

 I just went to that "pi to 50,000 decimal places" link, opened my find-in-this-page editor, and typed in random sequences of numbers. I got most 5-digit sequences, and a few 8-digit sequences.

"Any arbitrary sequence of numbers" would mean we could somewhere find the digital equivalent of _Hamlet_--that's too much to expect. You'll need to get your house in order.
 — baconbrain, Jul 20 2008

Careful, [snictown], the word "proof" in mathematics can be a bit tricky.
 — Jinbish, Jul 20 2008

The idea about Hamlet is true if pi is a normal number, and most people think it is normal.
 — futurebird, Jul 21 2008

It seems that given the infinite nature of the pi sequence, then [snictown] could be right - this is a quote from the link. "Now, if this be true, that p is completely random, then every conceivable sequence of numbers must somewhere occur in p . That is, if one considers any number, 12345678 for instance, that number will sooner or later be found in p if the search is pressed far enough. To assume otherwise would be to prejudice the randomness of p."
 — xenzag, Jul 21 2008

First, I don't know of any proof that pi is a random sequence of digits. I'm aware that lengthy sequences have been tested and found to be random, but that's different from being able to assert that the entire, infinite, sequence of digits in pi follows a completely random distribution (or are there, for example a fraction of a percentage more sevens in the sequence than you'd expect?).

Second, it seems common sense to say that "if the digits in pi follow a random distribution then every conceivable sequence of numbers must somewhere occur in pi" but I'm not sure that's actually true. To put it another way, if pi is random, then does that 'prove' that "1234567890" occurs somewhere in pi, or does it just make it very probable?
 — hippo, Jul 21 2008

Either way, I'm not that concerned. If I understand Gödel's incompleteness theorem well enough, it leaves enough room for no proof or perhaps of more importance, no disproof. As Pi DOES have a verifiable sequence, then I see no problem.
 — xenzag, Jul 21 2008

 //it has been proven that any arbitrary sequence of numbers appears somewhere in the sequence of pi.//

 [sninctown] It is conjectured, not proven.

 //Second, it seems common sense to say that "if the digits in pi follow a random distribution then every conceivable sequence of numbers must somewhere occur in pi" but I'm not sure that's actually true.//

 [hippo], if pi were to be proved a normal number, it would be a disjunctive sequence, and hence every finite string would be represented.

 [baconbrain] If it were a normal number, it would show uniform distribution in all bases. So Shakespeare, as well as Beethoven, and everything else (converted to binary), would have a representation in the binary representation of pi. As would this anno.

 However, we are a long way from finding pi to be a normal number.

[HegelStone] Not true, discussed before on the 'bakery, but it makes a great tagline!
 — 4whom, Jul 21 2008

//So Shakespeare, as well as Beethoven, and everything else (converted to binary), would have a representation in the binary representation of pi.//

Even messages could be found there, and will, with enough computing power. Hidden messages from God himself. And one day we’ll see a book titled, “The Pi Code: Finding God in Transcendental Numbers.”
 — ldischler, Jul 21 2008

Safe in the knowledge, that every ELS, would appear as plaintext somewhere hence, so you only have to expand pi to maximum half its actual places:-).
 — 4whom, Jul 21 2008

 If you make certain of the bricks removable, then when the mood strikes you you could switch them around.

 You could then invite people to come to your house, show them around, and when they say, "This is the same place you've been for the last five years," you could provably respond, "No, it's just a similar house in the same geographical location. Now give me my housewarming gifts."

Repeat until you have a full china set and no friends.
 — shapu, Jul 21 2008

The key to the answer to the question being asked is not so much the randomness of pi, but the infinite-ness of its sequence of digits. It is in that infinity that one could expect to find any FINITE arbitrary sequence. I conjecture it would be possible to find a place, somewhere in that infinity, that begins, 314159265358979323846... and proceeds to duplicate all the initial digits of pi, until this particular starting point is reached. After the duplication, effective randomness would follow, for a nice long stretch, and eventually a NEW starting point could be found, which duplicates everything up to THAT point. And so on.... If you don't think this is possible, then what it really means is that you don't properly understand what "infinity" allows.
 — Vernon, Jul 21 2008

 No, Vernon, infinity doesn't imply normalness.

 Here's how to build a counterexample: Take PI, translate it into binary, then read those digits back as decimal digits. The resulting number goes something like this: "11.0010010000111111..." That gets you another series of decimal digits that has roughly the same properties of infinity and non-repeatingness as PI -- except that it doesn't contain the digits 2 through 9. (It is thus not a normal number.) That sequence is still infinite, but doesn't contain the substring "2".

I agree that it's likely that PI is a normal number, but it's interesting that it's not (yet?) proven.
 — jutta, Jul 21 2008

 [jutta], you appear to be mixing conditions. I was not talking about a binary form of pi. But if I was, I would simply say that you ought to be able to take some arbitrary length of the initial ones and zeros (instead of some arbitrary length of Base-10 digits), and eventually find a duplicate of them, somewhere in the infinite sequence of ones and zeros.

A piece of trivia for those who haven't seen it before: pi can be computed as the sum of the infinite series 4/1 - 4/3 + 4/5 - 4/7 + 4/9 - 4/11 + 4/13 - 4/15 ... (don't try this without a computer; it takes a LOT of terms for the result to gradually converge into even the first few digits of pi)
 — Vernon, Jul 21 2008

 I'm not talking about the binary form of PI, I'm just using it to build a decimal number that is just as infinite as PI, yet doesn't contain some sequences of digits. That is a counterexample to your claim that infinity implies normalness.

// Repeat until you have a full china set and no friends.
[marked-for-tagline]
 — jutta, Jul 21 2008

[jutta], OK, I know there are contrived infinite sequences with properties such that you describe. Pi has not been shown to be such a sequence, just as it has not been shown to be random enough for "normality". I think, though, that it is random enough for most modest/finite arbitrary sequences of digits that one might care to specify, those sequences can be found somewhere among the digits of pi. I did say in my first post here that the key was less a matter of its randomess than a matter of its infinite-ness, and in saying that I did not mean to imply that the degree of randomness which it exhibits is discount-able.
 — Vernon, Jul 21 2008

I am compelled to quote from Gödel (via wikipedia)
"Gödel's first incompleteness theorem shows that any formal system that includes enough of the theory of the natural numbers is incomplete: it contains statements that are neither provably true nor provably false. Or one might say, no formal system which aims to define the natural numbers can actually do so, as there will be true number- theoretical statements which that system cannot prove."
 — xenzag, Jul 21 2008

 This is all a bit moot. [ldischler] said "Of course you can"; [jutta] said "?"; [snictown] said "yes. It's proven."; [jutta] said "I don't think so".

 Since then, the cut and thrust of the idea has been sidelined and there has been a debate about the randomness of Pi. Pi is not a random number, although it's irrational sequence appears to be so, and it is known to over a trillion decimal places.

 Therefore, I suggest that it does not matter whether the 42,000 combinations of brick-numbers form a section of Pi. They will look like it - and no-one will be able to realistically mount a counter-proof.

<I'm reminded of kids in a playround: "Your Mum *smells*", "No she doesn't", "Yes she does", "Prove it then", "No. You prove she doesn't smell"...>
 — Jinbish, Jul 22 2008

 Assuming that the infinity/normallness thing does apply to pi, then it may also apply to other numbers of the same ilk (pi+1, e, e-9, e+pi, phi, among others) In which case any sequence of arbitrary numbers must 'belong' to any number of arbitrary transcendental numbers.

 So you have an arbitrary sequence of bricks which *may* be found in any of an infinite and uncountable number of transcendental numbers - am I alone in thinking "Big Deal"?

 Anyway, if you want a house that's piesque, shouldn't it be circular?

At least the bricks aren't representations of sqrt(-1) - Who would want to live in an imaginary house?
 — zen_tom, Jul 22 2008

I dunno, it seems like a lovely place (in my head).
 — Jinbish, Jul 22 2008

To be fair, it is a nice house, it's just the gaping enlegged coelacanth lurking by the back door that gives me the heebeegeebees.
 — zen_tom, Jul 22 2008

If pi contained *every* possible sequence of numbers within its digits, then we would have to conclude that somewhere within pi is a never-ending string of 8's, just as long as pi itself.
 — napoleonbag, Jul 22 2008

//If pi contained *every* possible sequence of numbers within its digits, then we would have to conclude that somewhere within pi is a never-ending string of 8's, just as long as pi itself.//

Every possible *finite* sequence.
 — ldischler, Jul 22 2008

 Wha.

Would there be infinite strings of prime numbers scattered throughout Pi then?
<goes for an Aspirin>
 — 2 fries shy of a happy meal, Jul 22 2008

[2 fries shy of a happy meal]:
Long answer: <Morpheus> Unfortunately, no-one can be told how infinite Pi is - you have to prove it for yourself. </Morpheus>

 Hmm.By analyzing reoccurring sequences of prime number sequences within Pi would it possibly make it easier to...

 ...

...nope...I lost it. My bad. Carry on.
 — 2 fries shy of a happy meal, Jul 23 2008

Anyone else think of Heinlein's "--and he built a crooked house" when the imaginary house came up? I know a tessarect isn't imaginary, but it should be mentioned somewhere in a discussion of mathematical houses.
 — MechE, Jul 23 2008

//Anyway, if you want a house that's piesque, shouldn't it be circular?// pi is a *ratio* that *crops* up everywhere, not just in circles. Even in your imaginary house. In fact, specifically, in your imaginary house.
 — 4whom, Jul 23 2008

 Indeed. It is dismantling to be satisfied with the fact that a simple Leibniz series yeilds the digits of pi:

 4/1 - 4/3 + 4/5 - 4/7 ... = pi

WHY, PI, WHY?!?!
 — daseva, Jul 23 2008

 Whenever I see a series with x1 - x2 + x3 - x4 + ...

I think i, pi, i ?!?! :-)
 — 4whom, Jul 23 2008

Oddly enough, whenever I see a system that begins x1+x2+x3.... I think, "I'd like some pie."
 — shapu, Jul 23 2008

So next time someone asks me for my number I just write the symbol for 'pi'.
 — mecotterill, Jul 23 2008

I wonder how many people have those first few digits for their pi-n number.
 — 2 fries shy of a happy meal, Jul 23 2008

 In an undergraduate lecture, a tutor put the numbers 1,4,1,5,9 up on the board. He said, "I have a shiny new textbook for the first student who can tell me the next two numbers in this sequence..."

 All the students hastily got their notepads out and started to calculate whatever. All the students except [Jinbish] - he'd recognised the sequence straight away. A friend of his had memorised Pi at high school. [Jb] had been sitting next to him as he recited out loud 3.1415926 over and over again. [Jb] had almost fallen out with his repetitive mate... but now fate had smiled on his near madness-inducing episode.

"2 and 6!" and as the tutor looked up and smiled, and a hundred astonished faces turned round, he knew that both the textbook and infinite amounts of derision from the rest of the student body were now his!!
 — Jinbish, Jul 24 2008

The ideas explored in this discussion are the same as those in the Kate Bush Conjecture (see link) - essentially, she sung the digits of Pi but with a few out of sequence and the conjecture is that this 'wrong' sequence actually does occur somewhere in the expansion of Pi.
 — hippo, May 10 2017

 [irrelevant aside in response to earlier discussions]

There was a science fiction story (may have been Contact by Carl Sagan) in which a supercivilisation has engineered the universe and mathematics in such a way as to leave a message encoded in the digits of pi.
 — MaxwellBuchanan, May 10 2017

Yes, a circle visible as ones and zeroes in base 11.
 — nineteenthly, May 10 2017

That's also discussed in the link I provided
 — hippo, May 10 2017

Each house would need a single point survey datum to stick the initial 3 brick, vertically set of course.
 — wjt, May 11 2017

What exactly is pi again? I must've been ill, not at school when we did that. Maths, I think they called it.
 — Ian Tindale, May 11 2017

It's tau/2
 — hippo, May 11 2017

 Oddly enough, that story is encoded in pi somewhere. As is every annotation on this page.

But I'm not sure pi has enough digits to explain women.
 — RayfordSteele, May 11 2017

It certainly doesn't have enough to encode the excuses for that remark that you're going to need when the women catch up with you, [Ray] ...
 — 8th of 7, May 11 2017

Why call 2*pi tau, anyway? Wouldn't it be more consistent with the convention set by the kilogram to call it bipi?
 — b153b, May 11 2017

How long is pi, in base pi?
 — Ian Tindale, May 12 2017

Because tau looks like pi with just one vertical, which if you think about that as being the denominator, simply makes all sorts of intrinsic inherent sense and beauty, or at least as much as an irrational number can have.
 — RayfordSteele, May 12 2017

 //What exactly is pi again?//

 If you draw a square that's 2 units (inches, cm, metres, demi-furlongs whatever) and then draw a circle exactly in the middle whose edges touch the sides; Go on to sprinkle exactly 4000 grains of rice from a height such that they fall randomly across the square; you could use a sieve or some other sprinkly-outy device to assist with this - the important thing is that it's random (if any grains that fall outside the square, just sprinkle them again)

 (Alternately, you could do this with a box with a lid that's got a 2x2 base, and has a circle inscribed in the middle. It might make less of a mess.)

 Once you're finished, count the number of grains of rice inside the circle. You should have a 4 digit number, so just plop a decimal place after the 1st digit, and that should be that. That's what pi is. (Subject to local humidity, wind and gravitational conditions)

 If you want pi to more decimal places, try the same thing with 40,000, 400,000 or 4,000,000 grains of rice (after booking out a suitable period in your events calendar)

 Alternately, the same routine ought to be possible with lentils, mung beans or similar, and a weight-based approach where you start with 4g, 4kg or some 4-weight of something;

Sprinkle, shake or otherwise enturbulate and extract only the stuff that lands on the circle. That stuff, weighed again should have a value of pi, give or take the odd bean.
 — zen_tom, May 12 2017

Won't work with mung beans - they use the old Chinese Imperial pi, which is only accurate to about 2 decimal places.
 — MaxwellBuchanan, May 12 2017

 //How long is pi, in base pi?//

 1

That is, pi is exactly one pi long.
 — Loris, May 12 2017

 When you measure the length of pi, are you allowed to ignore the zero between the 1 and the decimal? I'd have thought pi base pi has length 2.

 Though really it's still infinitely long, but mostly zeroes.

 // Because tau looks like pi with just one vertical, which if you think about that as being the denominator, simply makes all sorts of intrinsic inherent sense and beauty //

 Oh, you see I'm an engineer, not a mathematician, so if I see anything with inherent sense and beauty I'm automatically suspicious. If it's slightly broken and irregular then I'm much more confident that it's going to work in the real world.

Maybe I'll go add bipi as a separate thing, for people like me.
 — b153b, May 12 2017

//going to work in the real world// What does that mean? In the "real world" we also have particles that can be in two places at once at the quantum level. I like the reality that is Pi being such a conundrum of numerical contradictions.
 — xenzag, May 12 2017

Well, clearly the answer to all this complication is that when referring to pi, we should all switch to base pi. That'd make everything far easier. Then when we're talking about normal stuff, switch back to base 10 (which is base two, in base two).
 — Ian Tindale, May 12 2017

I never knew there was no character limit on the text fields in a link here!
 — pocmloc, May 27 2017

A uniform distribution is not normal because a normal one is not uniform.
 — Voice, May 27 2017

 [annotate]

back: main index