Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
i v n i n seeks n e t o

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:
pass:
register,


               

C exception handling macros

Goto considered helpful
  (+7, -4)
(+7, -4)
  [vote for,
against]

With the two C macro definitions

#define except_throw(x) goto x

#define except_catch(x) while (0) x:

"goto"s can be made to look good in C. (It turns out that Dijkstra was making a fashion statement all along.)

The first one simply works around "goto" having a bad name.

The second is used with a dangling statement or block, like "if":

except_catch (mem) return ERR_OUT_OF_MEMORY;

or

except_catch (hit) { printf("Ouch!\n"); damage++; }

It introduces a C statement or block that is only executed if it is entered via a jump. This lets a programmer move exception handling code away from the main algorithm, a structural benefit shared with "real", operating-system level exceptions. (Which of course are infinitely cooler if they work right, but require a lot of support.)

except_catch() statements can nest; multiple except_catch()'es inside one big one could be used to set an error variable to an error to the specific catch phrase, then continue with a generic cleanup.

jutta, Aug 12 1999

Kazlib http://users.footpr...et/~kaz/kazlib.html
library which implements clean exceptions in C. [johnmeacham, Mar 15 2002]

[link]






       I'd just like to reiterate that real exceptions are still preferable. The biggest practical limitation of these macros, as far as I can see, is that the exception handler must be compiled together with the code that raises the exception (or you'll get a "missing label" error at compile time). So you can't write a shared library that throws an exception on some error condition with the expectation that the caller will handle it in a manner appropriate to context. Still, it's a reasonable hack for people who want exception syntax in an exceptionless environment.
baf, Apr 11 2000
  

       I had UNWIND_PROTECT, CATCH, and THROW macros: CATCH(block) returns 0 for normal completion, or whatever THROW was passed if it was called.   

       UNWIND_PROTECT(block, cleanup_block) runs the block, then runs the cleanup block regardless of whether the block excepted, then passes the exception back up the stack if one happened.   

       UNWIND_PROTECT({ char *p=malloc(42); foo(p); }, { free(p);})
reece, May 04 2000
  

       Re: baf's objection: isn't the usual way to implement exception macros in C to use setjmp in the catch (or try) macro, and longjmp in the throw macro?
brouhaha, Jun 15 2000
  

       Re: setjmp/longjmp: Yes! (see, for example, van der Linden's "Expert C Programming").
acooke, Aug 10 2000
  

       I didn't know you could put a label there; how sneaky.   

       How would reece's postulated UNWIND_PROTECT etc. macros work?
egnor, Apr 27 2001
  

       This reminds me why I don't do C.
phoenix, Mar 15 2002
  
      
[annotate]
  


 

back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle