Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
Chewable.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:
pass:
register,


                                                           

Car jack brake

Get a good view at the lights.
  (+35, -3)(+35, -3)(+35, -3)
(+35, -3)
  [vote for,
against]

car%20high%20outa%20sight%20after%20hard%20braking Forget flywheels or batteries: use hydraulics.
When stopping, use the inertia of the car to jack up the body of the vehicle above the road wheels.
Then release the stored energy to start the car moving again.
Real wacky racers style.
Ling, Nov 26 2004

. [FarmerJohn, Nov 29 2004]

Hoppin Lowriders http://www.lowrider...1lrm_sanantoniohop/
If anyone could build it, these guys could. [wagster, Nov 27 2004]

[link]






       A reverse wheelie on start?
FarmerJohn, Nov 26 2004
  

       I love this +
stupop, Nov 26 2004
  

       It has the advantage of working just as well for busses, etc... as for little cars. Heavier cars need more energy to get going or to stop, but also can store more when they are lifted.   

       On the other hand, there has to be a real limit to the height as I can see a panic stop with the wheel turned to avoid something in your path with the result that your car launches itself into the air and tumbles sideways.
James Newton, Nov 27 2004
  

       Nice one [Ling]! That's about as half baked as they come. Also quite buildable.
wagster, Nov 27 2004
  

       We need an illustration for this - FJ?
energy guy, Nov 28 2004
  

       hmmmmmm....
umm0i, Nov 29 2004
  

       [2FSOAHM], thanks.<deleted various comments>
Ling, Nov 29 2004
  

       Assuming that the entire weight of the vehicle could be lifted (i.e. that the parts like wheels that had to stay on the ground had zero mass), storing the energy from travelling at 25mph would require raising the vehicle over 20 feet. If the vehicle were going 50mph, the distance would be more than 83 feet. At 70mph, over 160 feet.   

       If the vehicle were limitted to being elevated 10 feet (which is still too much to be practical) the speed it could attain on descent would be less than 18mph. If the limit were 5 feet, the speed would be about 12mph.
supercat, Nov 29 2004
  

       Drat and double drat: Professor Pat Pending used to do it all the time (admittedly so that he could avoid Dick Dasturdly's traps).
Ling, Nov 29 2004
  

       Thank you FJ! Brilliant as usual.
energy guy, Nov 29 2004
  

       Great for very crowded roads, you have to go slow anyway, and there's lots of stopping and starting.
caspian, Nov 29 2004
  

       <advertisement voice> When driving down a hill, instead of using wasteful friction brakes, simply jack the car up roughly the height of the hill. You can't refill the tank but that's okay. You've saved so much energy it won't need it 'till next week! </advertisement voice>
caspian, Nov 29 2004
  

       hey energy! the idea is from Ling! credit where credit due.
po, Nov 29 2004
  

       [Po] I was thanking him for the illustration. [Ling] sorry for the confusion. Its a fun idea, and I bunned it.
energy guy, Nov 30 2004
  

       Must say that I thought this would be an idea for stopping car-jackers... hmmm. Maybe I should move to a better part of town.   

       Interesting idea [Ling], made me laugh.
Itsmeagain, Nov 30 2004
  

       Hrmmm ... if you put a penny in the back could we make it do wheelies?!
Letsbuildafort, Dec 03 2004
  

       Full marks [FJ]!
wagster, Dec 03 2004
  

       [+] neat clean little idea. Nice illustration too.   

       [supercat] thanks for the calcs. But wouldn't that be the same case for any other regenerative braking scheme? The merits of this one would not be in the magnitude of the energy, but in the relative efficiency of this method over other methods.   

       Doh! I just fouled and made an anno that was longer than the idea!
sophocles, Dec 03 2004
  

       Not only am I bunning the idea but I'm also gonna randomly bun one of FJ's ideas for the pic. [+] [+]
etherman, Mar 16 2005
  

       FJ, I've been looking at a picture of a truncated traffic light, wondering why there were all these comments.   

       In the "personal grooming hummingbird" I noticed that there seemed to be something missing from the picture. Then I clicked on the little dark square ICON.   

       Aah......how stupid am I.   

       Now I see. Yes it is good! Thanks!   

       Should the thumbnail be a complete drawing, or only a small section of the drawing?
Ling, Apr 25 2005
  

       The in-line thumbnails are usually only sections of the main picture. It's a bit like a christmas present, you might guess what it's going to be but you're often surprised.
wagster, Apr 25 2005
  

       Can someone please delete [Brandon Mitchel]'s account? This is getting tedious.
spidermother, Feb 16 2011
  

       ^who he?
not_morrison_rm, May 22 2018
  

       Probably related to [Travbm]
notexactly, May 25 2018
  

       Had to bone since the math says it won't work. There's simply a LOT of kinetic energy to store. Note also, that you'd have to transfer that energy to jacking the car up, which would require a transmission of sorts, which are notoriously inefficient.
EvilTronics, May 27 2018
  

       Wait; are you saying there's *too much* available energy, [EvilTronics]? I'm not contradicting you, but I'm wondering what particular failure mode is predicted by the maths.
pertinax, May 28 2018
  

       //^who he?// A spammer whose account was deleted.   

       [pertinax] e = mgh = œmv² => h = œmv²/g   

       Let v = 60km/h = 16.666 m/s. Then h = œ*16.666²/9.8 = 14.17m
spidermother, Jun 08 2018
  
      
[annotate]
  


 

back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle