h a l f b a k e r y
i v n i n seeks n e t o
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
or Create a new account.
|
|
|
My Idea is to start a farm, where the animals are kept in nice conditions, with plenty of food and medical care, with lots of space to roam around in. None of the animals are slaughtered. Instead, they live to old age, and eventually die of natural causes.
Their bodies are then collected, and given
to the butchers, who cut them up and pack them, and they are sold to supermarkets.
Vegetarians have no reason not to eat this meat. No animal was harmed, they got to live out their natural lives in comfort. And in death, they are giving others sustanance.
meat production of the future
http://news.bbc.co....ci/tech/4148164.stm
IAIN M. BANKS WAS RIGHT! [rainbow, Dec 16 2005]
Carrot Juice is Murder
http://www.folkweb....orms/carrot-load.ra
[DesertFox, Dec 17 2005]
[link]
|
| |
So veal and lamb are out, then? |
|
| |
There are *other* reasons for vegetarianism. Aside from anything medical, there's the fact that meat as a foodstuff is horrendously inefficient. It takes something like six tons of wheat to produce one ton of beef (might be ten, but I'll err on the side of caution for now). If we just ate the wheat, we could feed lots more people. |
|
| |
(Note for posterity: I am not a vegetarian. Not while there's bacon in the world). |
|
| |
a slightly simplistic view of the situation. |
|
| |
what about predatory animals, parasites, diseases? farming is unatural and is therefore the direct creation of suffering by humans. animals natural instinct is to breed so you couldn't seperate the sexes..but if you don't what happens to all the chicks, calves etc? |
|
| |
moomintroll makes a very good point. my research on the subject confirms a tenfold factor of efficiency. this planet of ours could easily feed 20 billion vegetarians...albert einstein suggested this is the next step in human evolution. |
|
| |
anyway, technology is already ahead of you...see link. |
|
| |
"Erhm, this meat is rather tough" |
|
| |
What was the idea about gengineering brainless cattle? |
|
| |
As comedian Ron White said, "I didn't climb all the way to the top of the food chain so I could eat carrots." |
|
| |
//farming is unatural and is therefore the direct creation of suffering by humans.// |
|
| |
Que? Some propose that plants in their benevolence by chance to humans have secured their own future for a fraction of infinity. |
|
| |
I can't vote FOR the idea. Though not yet a convert of vegetarianism, I know that your premise is flawed.
Convince me otherwise using amino acids, etc. |
|
| |
The older it gets the tastier is gets |
|
| |
are you being sarcastic [Pave]? |
|
| |
how many animals have you killed to eat? |
|
| |
Good on ya [Blisterman], not voting for your own idea and all. |
|
| |
No animals were harmed in the making of this annotation. |
|
| |
Ants, radishes, pears, calamari, and others are pretty wholistic or macrobiotic. I say eat what feels right. |
|
| |
Reminds me of a song... [linkie] |
|
| |
Eating an animal that died of natural causes is a very dangerous thing to do. |
|
| |
Still, it makes an interesting image of planning a holiday dinner. "Die, damn you, they'll be here any time now!" |
|
| |
Won't be able to eat turtles anymore, they live too long. |
|
| |
I'm a vegetarian (possibly the only one on this site), and the reason you've suggested is only one of the reasons. I dislike the taste of meat, I find it repulsive.
I also find the social conscience involved in eating meat repulsive. I find the crap about eating meat to support the farmers repulsive. I find farmers repulsive. Lastly, I find you're idea repulsive. Go gnaw on a bone. |
|
| |
//I find farmers repulsive// woah, relax. Granted, they're not everyone's cup of tea - the ubiquitous whippet down the trousers can be offputting when you're talking to 'em - but they do have some good aspects. Sometimes it's handy to have someone around who can drive a combine harvester. Especially when you're trapped in a barn, and BA Baracas is off doing another book signing, the git. |
|
| |
//possibly the only one on this site// almost certainly not. Don't flatter yourself. |
|
| |
How could anyone not like meat? I'm getting hungry just thinking about it. |
|
| |
meat tastes delcious of course..but sits very heavy on the conscience (and of course in the gut over time). |
|
| |
the point is animals will always suffer on a farm yet this almost completely avoidable by us all being vegan. our souls would be nourished along with our bodies. it is no coincidence that all forms of bacterial and viral disease contracted from food come from animal foods. |
|
| |
i have been vegan for ten healthy years, working in construction, ripped, never ill. soya contains more protein than beef and is easier to digest. |
|
| |
people who eat meat are smellier. and generally hypocrites. would you all eat horse? cat? dog? monkey? |
|
| |
"Stranger, Stranger in a Strange land. He looked at me like I..ahEyeEYE! was the one who should run." |
|
| |
I honestly would eat cat, horse, dog, and maybe monkey (it would have to be tested for AIDs first) But theres also the fact that I've made it my goal to eat as many different species of animals as heavenly possible. You name it I've tried to eat it. |
|
| |
The Question, [MikeOxbig]....I proposed, is would you, could you, In the dark?
Would you, could you, In the park?, celebrate Ximmy's demise. W/ festive Jestive no comprimise? |
|
| |
Celebrate the sad fool life? Ingest the power, could you survive? |
|
| |
What in the name of God are you rambling about [Zimmy]? Are you a crack-head? |
|
| |
//You name it I've tried to eat it.// |
|
| |
Have You read 'Stranger in a strange land', willing to try long pork? The line is drawn, but why & where? |
|
| |
You're absoloutley right, MOB. I deleted a major concept in my anno, resulting in my sputtering jibberish. I accidentally do this on a regualr basis. It's Jim's fault, too. Very sorry, Sir. |
|
| |
Also, I'm curious. Would you eat meat grown in petri dish? |
|
| |
Oh, what's the difference between eating a dead cow and eating a dead human? It gets rid of excess waste either way (although modern farming practices generally create more waste than they get rid of). |
|
| |
Some interesting points made in here. To take up a few:
//animals will always suffer on a farm yet this almost completely avoidable by us all being vegan//
Untrue, [rainbow]. Take a look at the number of field animals killed during harvest, or the effect of fertilizers and pesticides on groundwater - these are negative effects caused exclusively by arable farming. Unless you're proposing another model, problems still exist.
//our souls would be nourished along with our bodies//
Absolute horse shit. Either substantiate the claim with evidence (first for the existence of the soul, then for its nourishment by a calorific source, then for its preference for plant-based calories), or retract it.
As to the rest, I'm a meat eater, although I like to balance my diet with plenty of fruit and vegetables. I, also am rarely ill. Hooray for us, but I don't think it proves anything. I'd happily eat horse, dog and cat (probably already have at some point) but I'm not sure about monkey. I like monkeys, but not on a plate. This sort of leads on to [Honduras]' point about eating humans. On one level, yes, you're simply taking sustenance from dead matter. On another level, you sick bastard that's somebody's kid! I think cannibalism just requires too hefty a dose of rationality and lack of emotion for most people to be comfortable with. |
|
| |
What is it about vegetarianism that seems to so offend some meat eaters? I've lost count of the number of ideas that we've had posted on this site by people desperate to bring the joy of meat to the vegetarian masses.
//Vegetarians have no reason not to eat this meat//
...except that they're vegetarian of course.
[marked-for-deletion] stereotyping. |
|
| |
Since when is black pudding 'meat'? |
|
| |
Are you saying black pudding's okay for vegetarians? |
|
| |
first of all..as a bakery newbie..may i say wow! thank you everyone for all the erudite feedback. i haven't encountered this on the interweb before. finally found some people who actually WANT to have an argument! |
|
| |
regarding long pig...personally it is the only meat i am really interested in eating. i would relish it, assuming of course it was from a good source. [MikeOxbig] fancy donating a kidney? |
|
| |
i look forward to the day that we have vat grown meats. blood from live animals seems ok. or human blood, fat etc.. i ocassionally eat roadkill too if it is fresh. |
|
| |
{DocBrown] - thank you for picking me up on my sloppy reasoning there. i was being fairly poetic and metaphysical with the //soul// comment. i don't actually believe in the soul. what i mean is that, to me at least, it's a no-brainer that continuing one's own existence without ending the existence of another sentient being is a better way of living. |
|
| |
as to animals killed in arable agriculture..well that is unavoidable. but if we didn't need to grow crops to feed animals then there would be less land farmed therefore less death, pollution etc.. |
|
| |
[DrBob] makes an excellent point too. i have encountered automatic defense hostility from meateaters on a regular basis. perhaps it is because deep down, within the subconscious they feel bad about what they are doing? |
|
| |
I suspect that most omnivorous humans really couldn't care less whether vegetarians find the texture of meat repulsive, any more than they care that I find the texture of peanuts repulsive. |
|
| |
I'm also unsure why people assume that farming is cruel. For the successful farming of anything it is necessary to ensure the animal/crop gets the best possible access to resources such as food, water and other nutrients. It is also mandated that the death of food animals be as quick and painless as possible, though allowing an animal to die a lingering death from hunger or disease seems far more cruel than instantaneous brain death. |
|
| |
As to the fallacious argument that we are meant to be vegetarian... I'd be happy to embrace vegetarianism if our metabolisms didn't rely on ingestion of proteins and minerals found largely in meats, if our teeth were of similar design to those of cows and rabbits, and if our physiology and capabilities weren't obviously adapted for hunting, much like our omnivorous cousins, the chimpanzees and baboons. |
|
| |
The only reason we don't eat people, honestly, is because our ancestors figured out that it led to some pretty nasty consequences when they began eating their neighbours. To keep the peace they ganged up on the other species in the area, rather than wage war against each other. |
|
| |
There are no cannibals left on the planet. Even mortuary feasting, in the PNG highlands, has been stamped out. |
|
| |
Yes, we have to revise our farming methods, to maintain sustainable agriculture, but there are more pressing problems than that one. Overuse of energy sources and potable water spring to mind. |
|
| |
Hmm, well this is quite baked except for the part about having the animals die of "natural causes" in their "old age." That's not going to produce quality meat, and it's somewhat of a silly anthropocentric concept anyway. (Humans have cause to live until they're old, because they are highly social animals who can be usefully wise as elders, but most animals are done once they've had a chance to breed.) |
|
| |
If you're going to eat meat, it's best for environmental, moral and economic reasons to eat meat from animals that were properly cared for. You generally have to look beyond supermarkets to find sustainably & compassionately raised meat, because it's not able to compete on a dollars & cents basis with cramming cows into tiny stalls and injecting them with whatever makes them grow fastest. But there are people out there doing it anyway, because it's what they love, & they desperately need your support. |
|
| |
So: Love your local farmers! They deserve it! |
|
| |
//because it's not able to compete on a dollars & cents basis with cramming cows into tiny stalls and injecting them with whatever makes them grow fastest// |
|
| |
If you inject animals with hormones and try to sell the meat you will find it is almost universally excluded from export markets. There may be some abuse in domestic markets, but this is one of the myths of the vegetarian/green propaganda apparatus. Sorry. |
|
| |
GOD has something to say on this matter: |
|
| |
Deuteronomy 14:21 Ye shall not eat of anything that dieth of itself: thou shalt give it unto the stranger that is in thy gates, that he may eat it; or thou mayest sell it unto an alien: for thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God. |
|
| |
So this would be strictly for the alien market. |
|
| |
[UnaBubba] it is standard practice in all western countries to rountinely add antibiotics to animal foods simply in order to increase growth rates. |
|
| |
i can't believe folks have started quoting the bible! however..//And G*d said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed which is upon the face of the earth, and every tree, in which is the fruit of a tree yeilding seed; to you it shall be for meat.// gen 1:29 |
|
| |
in the developed world meat is an abused luxury. sure we can digest it but the idea that we NEED it is a fallacy. all of the protiens, minerals etc can be found in nonanimal foods, often with less associated toxins to process at the same time. colon cancer is virtually unknown in areas of the world where the diet is vegetarian. |
|
| |
[UnaBubba] No one was claiming that we were meant to be vegetarian. In fact, without the tasty, fatty, protein filled meat our ancestors gorged themselves on, they wouldn't have had the energy to begin devoting themselves to important things like designing forums to discuss new inventions. |
|
| |
The argument is that now that (in a certain percentage of the world at least) it is possible to live a healthy life without eating meat, and there is a certain amount of badness/sin/evil/whatever in taking the life of another being, those of us that can, should. |
|
| |
Not being a fatalist I certainly don't think we were "meant" to be vegetarian, but each individual's ecological footprint on the world would be smaller if they were vegetarian. This would be a good thing, so in a sense, it could be seen as the next step in human evolution. |
|
| |
That said, I eat just about anything; including tasty, tasty meat. |
|
| |
The only use meat serves in our advanced society is its role in the "Ritual Ode to the Firepit", whereat we gather to bestow alms to Heavenly Father ... fire provider. Yeaobugha! |
|
| |
i think the veal died of loneliness.... |
|
| |
So, assuming the world does adapt a vegan attitude and stops raising livestock, what would be the future for our tasty four-legged friends? Since it would be inhumane to simply kill all those cattle and sheep and chickens (ok, so chickens arent four-legged, but you get the point), we would have to set them free and let them un-domesticate themselves. But what would be the consequence of that? All of these farms would now, I assume, grow crops for human consumption, allowing us to reach that 20 billion mark in population. If this was the case, all of the cattle and such would be left to roam whatever ranch they were set free on, seeing as how cows are very inefficient at jumping fences, and would simply eat whatever crops that were being produced for human consumption. So what do we gain? A bunch of farm land that now can neither produce meat for people or crops for people. The only other option would be mass slaughter of all livestock, which would not be a positive event in anyones mind.
The bottom line is that we cant really change the system (not that I personally would want to anyway, I like beef). The only way to make the whole world vegetarian is to eliminate cattle and other livestock for their own good. Any other way and we would be leaving the animals to lead a much worse life than they now have. While I may not agree with the farming methods of everyone out there (whether or not they inject hormones, I have heard convincing arguments on both sides and havnt researched enough on my own to decide), I dont see a problem with eating meat, or for that matter, not eating meat. As my screen name implies, I prefer to supply my own meat, and I can promise you, the deer that supply my dinner have lived natural lives and died with as little suffering as possible. A well placed shot with an adequate weapon will kill an animal before it hears the "boom" or feels any pain, and that is what I strive for. |
|
| |
As for the actual idea, Im gonna have to fishbone it because, as stated before by others, eating the meat of an animal that dies of natural causes is generally a bad idea. And for the record, I dont see a problem with referring to the Bible. Just because you have faith in a greater being doesnt mean you cannot be intelligent or reasonable. |
|
| |
//The only other option would be mass slaughter of all livestock, which would not be a positive event in anyones mind.// |
|
| |
(Going along with [Hunter79764]'s view of the situation for the sake of argument)... Would a single, final mass slaughter of 100% of all livestock be *so* bad? When you compare it with the on-going mass slaughter of, for example, 67% of all beef cattle and 20% of all dairy cattle (beef cattle are usually killed at an age of around 15-20 months, dairy cattle at an average age of around 5 years), each and every year? |
|
| |
There might be one situation where most vegetarians accept meat in their mouth? |
|
| |
And this is live human meat, I mean oral sex, lol. |
|
| |
I'm a vegetarian only because I dislike the taste of meat. I'd happily kill an animal with my bare hands though. Or perhaps a hammer. I hate animals with a passion. |
|
| |
Good call [Hunter]. Of course, there's the possiblity that we turn the domesticated animals all loose, then fence the fields. Stock cross the roads, sometimes killing, sometimes being killed by the evil human race. Natural predators kill stock off until predatory animals (wolves, fox etc.) are overpopulated at the point when cows(chickens, etc.)become endangered. Now we have to relinquish much arable farm land to rebuild (at great cost) the "natural" habitat of the bovine. And deal with our children being eaten by hungry wolves. Food supplies dwindle, and a black meat market thrives. Cool huh? If we do it, mass slaughter is out. We couldn't eat all that meat or store it at once, much would go to waste. We'd have to stop the stock from breeding, and slaughter them as they come of age for eating until they're all gone. |
|
| |
Eh? Anyway, I personally don't see that I need meat, but I do want meat. And frankly I think my enjoyment is more important than that of a cow's. I honestly just think cow's have no rights, not even the intrinsic right to life. |
|
| |
EDIT: BTW, this idea still stinks, the problem is that whilst I hold the belief that animals don't deserve anything, most people disagree. The fact is most vegetarians have a deeper-rooted dislike of cruelty to animals or killing them at all than just what this would solve. |
|
| |
Why not make it even less cruel? Just wait
until a cow wanders off from he herd (so's
not to distress his friends), then pop him
with a high velocity rifle. T-1 = happy-
cow-thoughts; T+1 = no-cow-thoughts.
Hence, no unhappy cow. Also, no elderly
or sick depressed cow. Win win. |
|
| |