Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
Like you could do any better.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:
pass:
register,


                         

Economic Law Laundry Mangle

a crude metaphor
  (+2)
(+2)
  [vote for,
against]

Before electrical dryers, washing was wrung out using hand-cranked mangles, which squeezed water out of wet fabric between two rollers.

In this sculpture, one roller is marked "Ricardo" and the other, "Parkinson". The big wet sheet, which forms part of the installation, is figured with small, struggling people.

Lenticular printing of the text means that the word "Ricardo" is only visible if you approach from the left, while the word "Parkinson" is only visible if you approach from the right.

pertinax, Jan 01 2017

clowns https://www.youtube...watch?v=8StG4fFWHqg
jokers [popbottle, Jan 01 2017]

Wikipedia: Parkinson's Law https://en.wikipedi...iki/Parkinson's_law
in current understanding, Parkinson's law is a reference to the self-satisfying uncontrolled growth of the bureaucratic apparatus in an organization." [zen_tom, Jan 04 2017]

[link]






       Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to right, here I am wrung out in the middle with you.
popbottle, Jan 01 2017
  

       So, it's an "Economic Squeeze" ?
8th of 7, Jan 02 2017
  

       Yes, of a particular sort.   

       You can paraphrase Ricardo's Law as "If you *do* have a free market in labour, then sooner or later wages get squeezed down to the subsistence level".   

       You can paraphrase Parkinson's Law as "If you *don't* have a free market in capital, then sooner or later bureaucracy expands to stifle all other human activity".   

       Both of these laws has loop-holes, but neither can be ignored.   

       The political history of the mid-twentieth century can be seen as a series of attempts to play off one law against the other. Then, in a stroke of genius, the Third Way of the nineties showed that you could give free play to both at once. What could possibly go wrong?
pertinax, Jan 03 2017
  

       Errr, collateralized debt obligations ?
8th of 7, Jan 03 2017
  

       Are those anything like credit default swaps?
RayfordSteele, Jan 03 2017
  

       Or collateralized swap credits?
hippo, Jan 04 2017
  

       Very similar, yes.   

       Essentially, the process works like this:   

       1. You give your money to someone else to invest.   

       2. They take your money away.
8th of 7, Jan 04 2017
  

       Step (1) is optional
hippo, Jan 04 2017
  

       Step 1 is only relevant for private investments. The "Go straight to Step 2" sequence is more of a government thing.
8th of 7, Jan 04 2017
  

       3. They install a device on your person that captures everything you say, everything you type, pictures you take and gives away your GPS location at any time.   

       4. They get you to pay $600 for (3.)   

       Is there a commercial robotic version of the idea that prints money ?
bigsleep, Jan 04 2017
  
      
[annotate]
  


 

back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle