h a l f b a k e r y
Expensive, difficult, slightly dangerous, not particularly effective... I'm on a roll.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
or get an account
This display would feature pixels in a honeycomb arrangement, which I believe would be better at displaying curved shapes than normal displays since it can display strait lines in 60 degree increments instead of 90 degree increments like normal displays.
It would be a liquid crystal display, but
it could be made with other display technologies in the future. Each hexagonal pixel would be divided into three rhombus subpixels; one red, one green, and one blue.
The display would have two modes: horizontal mode, and vertical mode. The normal mode is horizontal (with the points of the hexagon on the sides), which would be better for displaying lines horizontally. When the display is rotated 30 degrees it would switch to the vertical mode (with the flat sides of the hexagon on the sides), which would be better for displaying lines vertically.
I dont know very much specific detail about how computers work, but I know this display would require custom software and it would probably require custom designed hardware as well (which I know would mean some major redesigning of computer electronics, which would be very expensive).
A regular hexagon
also shows a honeycomb. [BJS, Dec 14 2006]
[BJS, Dec 14 2006]
Liquid crystal display
[BJS, Dec 15 2006]
[BJS, Dec 18 2006]
Hex Grid Example
[BJS, Jul 01 2007]
Display with hexagonal pixels, called "hexels". [Spacecoyote, Dec 01 2008]
||I think you've already found the flaw.
Horizontals and verticals would look very
different in this display. Interesting idea,
||"I think you've already found the flaw. Horizontals and verticals would look very different in this display." That is not a flaw, it is just different.
||For some purposes, like 3D modelling and gaming, this seems like it would be better than the usual grid.mode
||This would probably be excelent for italicized fonts.
||Would also be excellent for displaying hexagons of various sizes.
||...for example honeycombs, or those knitted bedspreads.
||Instead of choosing Horizontal or Vertical priority, you could choose 45° and then horizontal and vertical would look the same.
||Doesn't pixel shape come down to what shape structure the light emitting atoms/molecules are .
A blob is probably easier to manufacture than a triangle .